Gillian Osmont vs Dustin Goldenberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Osmont vs Goldenberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Gillian Osmont vs Dustin Goldenberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Osmont has won 36.23% of points on his second serve, while Goldenberg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Osmont, in recent form, has won 36.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Goldenberg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Osmont has saved 22.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goldenberg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Osmont has won 16.67% of matches played (W/L 1/ 5), with Goldenberg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Osmont has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 10/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Goldenberg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 28% (W/L 19/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Osmont has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Goldenberg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Osmont winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Osmont winning 2 and Goldenberg winning 0. The last match between Osmont and Goldenberg was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 10-10-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Gillian Osmont getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Osmont and Goldenberg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Osmont winning 0 times and Goldenberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Osmont winning 0, and Goldenberg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Osmont has played against opponents with an average rank of 48 while Goldenberg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Osmont has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goldenberg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Osmont has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goldenberg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Osmont 1 - 0 Goldenberg
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
28% (11-29)
Career Total W/L
25% (24-73)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Osmont VS Goldenberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Gillian Osmont | Dustin Goldenberg |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Osmont VS Goldenberg H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gillian Osmont | Dustin Goldenberg |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 36% (32/57) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 72 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (23/44) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 43% (10/23) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 24% (5/21) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (21/53) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gillian Osmont Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 3-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Gillian Osmont
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Hammond
Player
Gillian Osmont
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sam Thompson
Player
Gillian Osmont
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kaito Uesugi
Player
Gillian Osmont
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Gillian Osmont
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rhys Searant
Player
Gillian Osmont
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 13-11 | H2H |
view more
Dustin Goldenberg Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nathan Seateun
Player
Dustin Goldenberg
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adi Dagan
Player
Dustin Goldenberg
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lj Fick
Player
Dustin Goldenberg
38%
(
32 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(6) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Wian Roothman
Player
Dustin Goldenberg
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 5-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Haadin Bava
Player
Dustin Goldenberg
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more