search

Gio Jang vs Sanne Schalekamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Schalekamp analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Gio Jang vs Sanne Schalekamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 42.62% of points on his second serve, while Schalekamp has won 21.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 56.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schalekamp has won 56.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.88% and 18.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 41.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schalekamp has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 16), with Schalekamp winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Schalekamp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10), where as Schalekamp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jang winning 2 and Schalekamp winning 0. The last match between Jang and Schalekamp was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-10-2022, Q3, Hard with Gio Jang getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Jang and Schalekamp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jang winning 0 times and Schalekamp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jang winning 0, and Schalekamp 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 108.83 while Schalekamp has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 83% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schalekamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 34.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schalekamp has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 0 Schalekamp

Gio Jang

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

18

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

21

Age

Plays

Sanne Schalekamp

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L W L W L L W L

Form

W L L W L L W L L L

50% (33-33)

Career Total W/L

22% (5-18)

43% (3-4)

YTD W/L

0% (0-1)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Jang VS Schalekamp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Gio Jang Sanne Schalekamp
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 5
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Jang VS Schalekamp H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-1

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Gio Jang Sanne Schalekamp
YTD W/L 43% (3/4) 0% (0/1)
Sets Win/Loss 40% (6/9) 0% (0/2)
Games Win/Loss 45% (62/76) 25% (4/12)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 40% (2/3) 0% (0/1)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.01 0
Aces Total 1 0
DFs per game 0.21 0
DFs Total 14 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 116.14 0
1st Serve % 45% (98/220) 72% (33/46)
1st Serve W% 66% (65/98) 39% (13/33)
2nd Serve W% 43% (52/122) 31% (4/13)
BPs Won% Total 34% (10/29) 50% (2/4)
Return Pts W% 44% (107/245) 39% (20/51)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets W% 43% (3/7) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (2/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 20% (5/1) 0% (1/0)

Gio Jang Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q2
L
6-0 6-4 H2H
Q1
W
6-4 7-5 H2H
Q1
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Anna Ureke
Player
Gio Jang
75% ( 39 of 52)
1st Serve %
38% ( 15 of 39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 8 of 15)
38% ( 5 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 5 of 24)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
35% ( 18 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 26 of 39)
60
Total Points Won
31
L
6-0 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Gio Jang
Player
Zumra Balkan
53% ( 23 of 43)
1st Serve %
40% ( 18 of 45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
11
87% ( 20 of 23)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 10 of 18)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 12 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 27 of 45)
58
Total Points Won
30
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Gio Jang
66% ( 37 of 56)
1st Serve %
48% ( 24 of 50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
57% ( 21 of 37)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
41% ( 23 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
64
Total Points Won
42
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Gio Jang
Player
Yoana Radulova
41% ( 36 of 88)
1st Serve %
72% ( 66 of 92)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
81% ( 29 of 36)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 41 of 66)
48% ( 25 of 52)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
39% ( 34 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 39 of 92)
93
Total Points Won
87
W
5-7 6-4 10-5 H2H
R1
cross
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Gio Jang
48% ( 34 of 71)
1st Serve %
53% ( 46 of 86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
74% ( 25 of 34)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 25 of 46)
54% ( 20 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
37% ( 26 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 45 of 86)
90
Total Points Won
67
L
5-7 6-1 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Gio Jang
Player
Nicol Benesova
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve %
59% ( 27 of 46)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78% ( 25 of 32)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
56% ( 9 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 24 of 46)
58
Total Points Won
36
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q2
W
6-3 6-2 H2H

Sanne Schalekamp Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Alice Soulie
Player
Sanne Schalekamp
53% ( 27 of 51)
1st Serve %
72% ( 33 of 46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 20 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 29 of 46)
60
Total Points Won
37
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Margarita Skryabina
Player
Sanne Schalekamp
55% ( 21 of 38)
1st Serve %
67% ( 20 of 30)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
81% ( 17 of 21)
1st Serve Won
25% ( 5 of 20)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
32% ( 12 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
80% ( 24 of 30)
50
Total Points Won
18
L
6-0 6-1 H2H
Q2
W
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q2
L
7-5 6-0 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
L
6-3 6-0 H2H
QF
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
W
6-3 6-3 H2H

Jang Vs Schalekamp Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions