Gleb Sakharov vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sakharov vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Gleb Sakharov vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sakharov has won 50.82% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sakharov, in recent form, has won 58.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sakharov has saved 61.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sakharov has won 50% of matches played (W/L 3/ 3), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sakharov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 122/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Sakharov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 3/ 3), where as Przysiezny has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sakharov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sakharov winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 0. The last match between Sakharov and Przysiezny was at the Quimper Challenger, 28-01-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Gleb Sakharov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sakharov and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sakharov winning 0 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sakharov winning 0, and Przysiezny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sakharov has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sakharov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sakharov has converted 40.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sakharov 1 - 0 Przysiezny
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
868
Rank
153
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
60% (399-265)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$180,375
Career Prize Money
$403,630
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sakharov VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Gleb Sakharov | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:54:49 | 0:54:49 |
1st Serve % | 68% (28/41) | 59% (30/51) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (24/28) | 57% (17/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (6/13) | 14% (3/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 61% (31/51) | 27% (11/41) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sakharov VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-0 |
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Michal Przysiezny
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gleb Sakharov | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 59% (54/37) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 2 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.05 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (73/112) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (47/73) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (21/39) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (10/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 49% (57/117) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gleb Sakharov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Igor Kudriashov
Player
Gleb Sakharov
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Andrea Bolla
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
45%
(
13 of
29)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Finn Bass
Player
Gleb Sakharov
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Terence Atmane
Player
Gleb Sakharov
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
0-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Alexander Crnokrak
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yunseong Chung
Player
Gleb Sakharov
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more