Govind Nanda vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nanda vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Govind Nanda vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nanda has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Krueger has won 52.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nanda, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 49.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nanda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 58.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nanda has won 50% of matches played (W/L 4/ 4), with Krueger winning 52.63% (W/L 30/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 106/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 23/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Nanda winning 1 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Nanda winning 3 and Krueger winning 7. The last match between Nanda and Krueger was at the San Diego Open - San Diego, 18-09-2022, Q3, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nanda and Krueger have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nanda winning 1 times and Krueger 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nanda winning 1, and Krueger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nanda has played against opponents with an average rank of 76.25 while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 262.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nanda has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 32% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nanda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 37.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nanda 1 - 3 Krueger
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
1
Hard2
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
282
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
58% (112-80)
Career Total W/L
53% (391-352)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$56,390
Career Prize Money
$693,488
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Govind Nanda | Mitchell Krueger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
Sets Won | 3 | 7 |
Games Won | 42 | 59 |
Aces (Total) | 16 | 15 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 11 |
Avg Match Time | 2:16:12 | 2:16:12 |
1st Serve % | 64% (224/348) | 63% (229/362) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (139/224) | 62% (142/229) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (49/124) | 57% (76/133) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (12/40) | 49% (20/41) |
Return Points W% | 40% (144/362) | 46% (160/348) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 5-7 7-5 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Govind Nanda
64%
(
87 of
136)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
60 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
123
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
0-6 7-6(10) 7-5 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
51 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
111
Total Points Won
120
|
||||
6-3 6-2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Govind Nanda
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
6-4 6-3 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Govind Nanda
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Govind Nanda | Mitchell Krueger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (27/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (245/235) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (10/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
Aces Total | 0 | 83 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:59:46 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 343.53 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (974/1493) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (680/974) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (272/519) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (53/141) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (624/1609) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Rincon
65%
(
80 of
123)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
125
Total Points Won
118
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
August Holmgren
Player
Mitchell Krueger
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
14
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more