Govind Nanda vs Paul Jubb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nanda vs Jubb analysis and find out who is favored!
Govind Nanda vs Paul Jubb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nanda has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jubb has won 53.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nanda, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jubb has won 51.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nanda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jubb has saved 61.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nanda has won 50% of matches played (W/L 2/ 2), with Jubb winning 67.74% (W/L 42/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 23/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Nanda winning 1 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Nanda winning 5 and Jubb winning 7. The last match between Nanda and Jubb was at the Tiburon Challenger, 04-10-2022, First, Hard with Paul Jubb getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nanda and Jubb have played a deciding set 4 times, with Nanda winning 1 times and Jubb 3 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nanda winning 1, and Jubb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nanda has played against opponents with an average rank of 74.75 while Jubb has played against players with an average rank of 292.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nanda has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jubb has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nanda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jubb has converted 44.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nanda 1 - 3 Jubb
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
1
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
372
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
58% (112-80)
Career Total W/L
69% (189-83)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$56,390
Career Prize Money
$54,540
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Govind Nanda | Paul Jubb |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
Sets Won | 5 | 7 |
Games Won | 51 | 65 |
Aces (Total) | 17 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 22 |
Avg Match Time | 2:23:52 | 2:23:52 |
1st Serve % | 64% (252/392) | 61% (237/389) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (150/252) | 64% (152/237) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (65/140) | 50% (76/152) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (16/37) | 46% (23/50) |
Return Points W% | 41% (161/389) | 45% (177/392) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 4-6 6-3 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Govind Nanda
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
112)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
1-6 7-5 7-6(4) |
Govind Nanda
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
105 of
155)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
15
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
65 of
105)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
71 of
155)
127
Total Points Won
128
|
||||
6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Govind Nanda
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Govind Nanda
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
82%
(
27 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Govind Nanda | Paul Jubb |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (19/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (45/27) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (388/317) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.36 |
Aces Total | 0 | 125 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.26 |
DFs Total | 0 | 88 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:26 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 275.48 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (1325/2158) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (957/1325) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (457/833) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (96/234) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (955/2325) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (19/10) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (19/29) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (18/15) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (18/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 36% (11/4) |
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yunseong Chung
Player
Paul Jubb
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Egor Gerasimov
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Andrew Fenty
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Paul Jubb
Player
Fajing Sun
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Jea Moon Lee
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
47 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Paul Jubb
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more