Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gueorgui Roumenov-Payakov vs Mark Vervoort Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Roumenov-Payakov vs Vervoort analysis and find out who is favored!
Gueorgui Roumenov-Payakov vs Mark Vervoort Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roumenov-Payakov has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vervoort has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roumenov-Payakov, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vervoort has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Roumenov-Payakov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vervoort has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Roumenov-Payakov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vervoort winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roumenov-Payakov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vervoort has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roumenov-Payakov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vervoort has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Roumenov-Payakov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vervoort has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Roumenov-Payakov 0 - 0 Vervoort
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
R
Plays
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roumenov-Payakov VS Vervoort H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Gueorgui Roumenov-Payakov Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available
Mark Vervoort Recent Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Michael Geerts
Player
Mark Vervoort
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mark Vervoort
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mark Vervoort
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Mark Vervoort
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Vervoort
Player
Youlian Iakovlev
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bellotti
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Mark Vervoort
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Roumenov-Payakov Vs Vervoort Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
