Hady Habib vs Carlos Maria Zarate Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve performance, Carlos Maria Zarate holds a slight edge with 44.72% success compared to Hady Habib's 44.17%. Does this indicate an advantage? Typically, yes.
• When examining return game stats, Zarate is stronger, winning 47.78% of second serve points and 30.66% of first serve returns, outmatching Habib's 43.53% and 24.89%, respectively.
• Under pressure, Habib is more successful at saving breakpoints, with a rate of 59.75% against Zarate's 51.46%. Could this be decisive? It often impacts crucial points in a match.
• Over the past year, Zarate boasts a higher match win rate of 55.38% as opposed to Habib's 51.79%, indicating a potentially better recent form.
• Habib excels on hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, whereas Zarate prefers clay, also at 67%. On their least favorite surfaces, Habib shows better adaptability.
• In the past year, Habib has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 236.32, compared to Zarate's more modest 310.68.
• Both players have identical 50% success rates in deciding sets, suggesting equal performance under final-set pressure.
• The level of events played differs, with Habib competing mostly in Challengers and higher-level ITF tournaments, suggesting he may be used to tougher competition than Zarate, who commonly plays in lower-tier Futures events.

Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):

As we examine the upcoming tennis match between Hady Habib and Carlos Maria Zarate, several factors come into play. Carlos Maria Zarate appears slightly superior on second serve statistics and return games, suggesting stronger baseline engagement.

However, Hady Habib exhibits a better capability to handle pressure by saving more breakpoints. His experience against higher-ranked opponents may also indicate a readiness for tougher matches, providing him with the composure needed to win challenging points.

Considering surface preferences, Habib's proficiency on hard courts could be significant, particularly if the match is played on such a surface, while Zarate's penchant for clay might not be as advantageous.

Both players are equally matched when it comes to deciding sets, but Habib's consistent performance past the initial sets and competitive experience in higher-tier tournaments suggest a slight edge.

Given the context of these statistics and insights, Hady Habib seems to hold a marginal advantage going into this match, especially if it unfolds on a hard court surface. Thus, based on the analysis, Hady Habib is the more likely victor in this upcoming encounter.