Hady Habib vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 05:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Habib vs K. Kang

LIB
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Habib 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hady Habib winning 2 and Kyle Kang winning 0. The last match between Hady Habib and Kyle Kang was at the Chicago Challenger, 05-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Hady Habib getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Habib | 1 |
| Kang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chicago Challenger(08-05-25)
H. Habib vs K. Kang H2H Profile
H. Habib vs K. Kang Match Preview:
- Recent performance on second serve: Kang slightly outperforms Habib with 45.53% over 43.28% of points won. This small edge in second serve success could sway match predictions.
- Return game comparison: Kang is stronger in returning both first and second serves, winning 48.87% and 28.75% respectively, compared to Habib's 41.91% and 23.57%. This gives Kang a notable advantage.
- Under pressure: Habib saves more breakpoints at 58.88% compared to Kang's 49.07%. Could this resilience under pressure be crucial in tight moments?
- Overall performance: Kang has a better win-loss ratio (73.53%) over the past year than Habib (53.33%). Does this pattern suggest Kang's current superiority?
- Surface preference: Habib excels on hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Kang favors clay with a 62% win rate. The surface type of the upcoming match could influence the outcome.
- Playing tier: Kang's high success rate (76.67%) at Futures/ITF level surpasses Habib's (57.14%) at Challenger/ITF events. Is Kang competing at a higher efficiency for the level of play?
- Quality of opponents: Habib has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 226.12, as opposed to Kang's 395.62. Does Habib's higher level of competition grant him an edge?
- Deciding set prowess: Kang shines in deciding sets, winning 67%, slightly above Habib's 58%. Could Kang's clutch performance determine the result?
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kang's conversion rate of 45.16% is superior to Habib's 27.59%, indicating a critical advantage in break opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the current stats and performance trends, Kang holds a slight edge in several areas over Habib. With superior return game statistics and more success in breakpoint conversion, Kang has the tools to capitalize on critical match points.
Moreover, Kang's recent winning percentage and success in deciding set matches further highlight a well-rounded and resilient competitive edge, despite competing at a lower event level than Habib. However, Habib's ability to save breakpoints must not be overlooked and could play a significant role in tight scenarios.
Given the data, Kang appears to have a marginal advantage in this matchup, suggesting Kang is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Hady Habib vs Kyle Kang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Habib vs K. Kang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:1:30 | Average Match Time | 2:1:30 |
| 55% (41/74) | 1st Serve % | 53% (44/83) |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (34/44) |
| 55% (18/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 39% (32/83) | Return Points Win % | 34% (25/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Habib Recent Matches Played
K. Kang Recent Matches Played

H. Habib vs K. Kang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.69% (326/194) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.27% (81/58) |
| 59.82% (719/483) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.73% (180/143) |
| 53.49% (6237/5424) | Games Win/Loss | 52.07% (1612/1484) |
| 66.55% (193/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (60/40) |
| 59.90% (115/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.76% (21/13) |
| 48.57% (17/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 3263 | Aces Total | 334 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1477 | Total Double Faults | 267 |
| 1:19:22 | Average Match Time | 1:39:57 |
| 431.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.36 |
| 61% (18214/29669) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5163/8766) |
| 73% (13252/18214) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3470/5163) |
| 51% (5899/11455) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1842/3603) |
| 39% (1065/2698) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (397/929) |
| 37% (11197/29899) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3646/8864) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.11% (69/66) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 68.95% (242/109) | Futures W/L | 61.60% (77/48) |
| 62% (316/507) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (78/135) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 59% (117/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (20/40) |
| 56% (91/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (25/43) |
| 90% (314/282) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (70/62) |
| 10% (314/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (70/8) |
| 21% (206/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (69/19) |