Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hamad Medjedovic vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Medjedovic vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Hamad Medjedovic vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Medjedovic has won 47.68% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 41.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Medjedovic, in recent form, has won 48.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 29.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Medjedovic has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 55.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Medjedovic has won 64.58% of matches played (W/L 31/ 17), with Zima winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 58/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 14/ 6), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Medjedovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Medjedovic winning 2 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Medjedovic and Zima was at the Luedenscheid Challenger, 26-06-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Hamad Medjedovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Medjedovic and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Medjedovic winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Medjedovic winning 0, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Medjedovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.15 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 134.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Medjedovic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Medjedovic has converted 42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 45.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Medjedovic 1 - 0 Zima
133
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
62% (106-66)
Career Total W/L
56% (155-123)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$280,770
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Medjedovic VS Zima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Hamad Medjedovic | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:48:7 | 0:48:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (33/46) | 44% (15/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 33% (5/15) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (7/13) | 42% (8/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (21/34) | 33% (15/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Medjedovic VS Zima H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Leopold Zima
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hamad Medjedovic | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 60% (32/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (43/50) | 53% (281/248) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 74 | 133.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (182/287) | 69% (528/770) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (127/182) | 72% (378/528) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (49/105) | 43% (104/242) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (11/25) | 41% (24/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (108/283) | 35% (251/727) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
44%
(
39 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
13
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Marco Cecchinato
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Arthur Fils
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
19
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
62 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
20 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
78
|
3-4(6) 4-1 4-2 3-4(9) 4-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Dominic Stricker
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
15 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
3 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
26
|
4-3(5) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
18
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
49 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
14 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
3-4(6) 4-2 4-3(5) 4-2 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Luca Van Assche
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
4-2 2-4 4-3(7) 4-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alex Michelsen
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
78%
(
87 of
112)
14
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
4
89%
(
54 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
27 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-2 4-3(3) 3-4(3) 3-4(5) 4-3(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
56%
(
75 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
10
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
58 of
73)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
47 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
114)
124
Total Points Won
124
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Medjedovic Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
