Hamish Stewart vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 10:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Stewart vs L. Broady

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stewart 1 - 0 Broady
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hamish Stewart winning 2 and Liam Broady winning 0. The last match between Hamish Stewart and Liam Broady was at the M25 Glasgow, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Hamish Stewart getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stewart | 1 |
| Broady | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Glasgow(10-30-25)
H. Stewart vs L. Broady H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,004,050 |
| 65.82% (156-81) | Career Total W/L | 58.50% (530-376) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Stewart vs L. Broady Match Preview:
- In recent form, Hamish Stewart has been more effective on his second serve, winning 47.97% of points compared to Liam Broady's 43.34%. Could this serve advantage be crucial?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Stewart also outshines Broady, winning 43.47% compared to 40.65%. However, Broady has a slight edge in returning first serves, with 25.03% against Stewart's 23.49%.
- Under pressure, Stewart appears more resilient, saving 54.73% of breakpoints, while Broady saves 48.45%. Does this make Stewart a more reliable choice under clutch situations?
- Reflecting on the past year, Broady has a better overall win rate at 73.68%, compared to Stewart's 68.24%, suggesting a slight edge in recent performance.
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces with identical career win percentages of 70%, but Stewart struggles more on grass than Broady, who only wins 36% of his matches on this surface.
- Both players have been competing mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Broady having a higher success rate of 76.81% compared to Stewart's 70.97%.
- Broady has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 388.11 whereas Stewart's opponents averaged a rank of 420.68. Will this experience give Broady a competitive edge?
- In deciding sets, Stewart has a slight advantage, winning 59%, while Broady has won 57%. In a tight match, could this make Stewart the favorite?
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Both Hamish Stewart and Liam Broady have strong performances on hard courts, with each achieving a 70% win rate. This upcoming match is likely to be closely contested.
Although Broady has a slightly better overall win percentage in the past year and has faced tougher opponents, Stewart's recent second-serve performance and his ability to handle pressure could be decisive factors in this match.
Considering Stewart's marginal advantage in deciding sets and ability to save breakpoints, he might hold a slight edge over Broady.
Based on the analysis of their recent statistics and trends, Hamish Stewart seems more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Hamish Stewart vs Liam Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Stewart vs L. Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:34:23 | Average Match Time | 1:34:23 |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve % | 72% (44/61) |
| 76% (26/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (27/44) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 43% (26/61) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Stewart Recent Matches Played
L. Broady Recent Matches Played

H. Stewart vs L. Broady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.82% (156/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.50% (530/376) |
| 63.53% (338/194) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.02% (1194/900) |
| 55.24% (2842/2303) | Games Win/Loss | 52.98% (10430/9256) |
| 62.86% (66/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.23% (282/164) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.93% (78/64) |
| 70.64% (77/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.35% (137/90) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 36.26% (33/58) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1595 | Aces Total | 2465 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 762 | Total Double Faults | 1576 |
| 1:26:23 | Average Match Time | 1:14:22 |
| 397.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 514.76 |
| 62% (8498/13601) | 1st Serve % | 63% (30207/48040) |
| 75% (6345/8498) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20601/30207) |
| 50% (2549/5103) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (9314/17826) |
| 40% (584/1471) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2042/4741) |
| 39% (5755/14581) | Return Points Win % | 40% (19013/47658) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Slam W/L | 47.27% (26/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 45.98% (40/47) |
| 55.56% (20/16) | Challenger W/L | 55.50% (227/182) |
| 67.68% (134/64) | Futures W/L | 67.46% (226/109) |
| 66% (154/234) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (519/878) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 52% (45/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (137/271) |
| 51% (29/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (141/269) |
| 93% (151/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (520/454) |
| 7% (151/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (520/65) |
| 17% (86/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (384/76) |