Hank Trondson vs Jibril Nettles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trondson vs Nettles analysis and find out who is favored!
Hank Trondson vs Jibril Nettles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trondson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nettles has won 23.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trondson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nettles has won 28.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trondson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nettles has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trondson has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 3/ 4), with Nettles winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trondson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Nettles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 12/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Trondson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4), where as Nettles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trondson winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trondson winning 2 and Nettles winning 0. The last match between Trondson and Nettles was at the M15 Champaign, 12-09-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Hank Trondson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trondson and Nettles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trondson winning 0 times and Nettles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trondson winning 0, and Nettles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trondson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nettles has played against players with an average rank of 21.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trondson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nettles has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trondson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nettles has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trondson 1 - 0 Nettles
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (8-8)
Career Total W/L
40% (17-25)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hank Trondson | Jibril Nettles |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hank Trondson | Jibril Nettles |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hank Trondson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Hank Trondson
Player
Gus Tettamble
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 2-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Jibril Nettles Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adit Sinha
Player
Jibril Nettles
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
3
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Jibril Nettles
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pierce Brazil Rollins
Player
Jibril Nettles
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Chih Chi Huang
Player
Jibril Nettles
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more