Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hanwen Li vs Markus Eriksson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Eriksson analysis and find out who is favored!
Hanwen Li vs Markus Eriksson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 38.46% of points on his second serve, while Eriksson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 45.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eriksson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eriksson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 55.26% of matches played (W/L 21/ 17), with Eriksson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 59/ 51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25). Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 258/ 182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 75/ 68).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11), where as Eriksson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Li winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Eriksson winning 2. The last match between Li and Eriksson was at the M15 Antalya, 03-02-2021, First, Clay with Markus Eriksson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Eriksson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Eriksson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Eriksson 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 166.08 while Eriksson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eriksson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 80% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eriksson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 1 - 1 Eriksson
549
Rank
524
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
277
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
51% (78-76)
Career Total W/L
57% (405-310)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hanwen Li | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (60/77) | 77% (57/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (39/60) | 67% (38/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (6/17) | 59% (10/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (26/74) | 42% (32/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Markus Eriksson
Player
Hanwen Li
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
60 of
77)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hanwen Li | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hanwen Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Hanwen Li
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
Thanapet Chanta
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Hanwen Li
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Hanwen Li
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
36%
(
28 of
78)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Hanwen Li
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
16
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
23%
(
20 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Hanwen Li
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
James McCabe
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Markus Eriksson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ryan James Storrie
Player
Markus Eriksson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Jonas Trinker
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Ioannis Stamoulos
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Markus Eriksson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Markus Eriksson
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Markus Eriksson
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
25 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Mridha
Player
Markus Eriksson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Markus Eriksson
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wojciech Marek
Player
Markus Eriksson
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Eriksson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
