Harmony Tan vs Lara Schmidt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Tan vs L. Schmidt

Harmony Tan
FRA
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
26
-
Height
-
243
C. Rank
669
90
Best Rank
478
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$638.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Lara Schmidt
GER
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
26
-
Height
-
243
C. Rank
669
90
Best Rank
478
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$638.7K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tan 1 - 0 Schmidt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 2 and Lara Schmidt winning 0. The last match between Harmony Tan and Lara Schmidt was at the W25+H Calvi, 10-04-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tan | 1 |
| Schmidt | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W25+H Calvi(04-10-19)
Harmony Tan
6
6
Lara Schmidt
3
0
H. Tan vs L. Schmidt H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $638,698 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.41% (389-313) | Career Total W/L | 51.72% (120-112) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 11 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Tan vs L. Schmidt Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harmony Tan has won 40.26% of points on their second serve, while Lara Schmidt has won 41.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harmony Tan, in recent form, has won 48.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lara Schmidt has won 44.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.01% and 32.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Harmony Tan has saved 51.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lara Schmidt has saved 36.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Harmony Tan has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/28), with Lara Schmidt winning 45.00% (W/L 9/11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Harmony Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 19/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 130/128). Lara Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 39/24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 63/74).
- Player level: In the last year, Harmony Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.75% of matches (W/L 48/25), where as Lara Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 4/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Harmony Tan winning 1 times and Lara Schmidt being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Harmony Tan winning 2 and Lara Schmidt winning 0.
- The last match between Harmony Tan and Lara Schmidt was at the W25+H Calvi, 10-04-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 4:38:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harmony Tan has played against opponents with an average rank of 347.8 while Lara Schmidt has played against players with an average rank of 372.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harmony Tan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lara Schmidt has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Harmony Tan has converted 42.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lara Schmidt has converted 26.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Harmony Tan vs Lara Schmidt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Tan vs L. Schmidt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 4:38:0 | Average Match Time | 4:38:0 |
| 53% (29/55) | 1st Serve % | 71% (27/38) |
| 62% (18/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 65% (17/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 63% (24/38) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tan 48%, Schmidt 40%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tan 56%, Schmidt 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Tan 56%, Schmidt 42%.
H. Tan Recent Matches Played
L. Schmidt Recent Matches Played

H. Tan vs L. Schmidt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.41% (389/313) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.72% (120/112) |
| 55.35% (869/701) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.54% (269/243) |
| 52.64% (7284/6553) | Games Win/Loss | 51.78% (2352/2190) |
| 56.47% (131/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.90% (39/24) |
| 50.39% (130/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.99% (63/74) |
| 59.89% (109/73) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 63.33% (19/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1101 | Aces Total | 50 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1212 | Total Double Faults | 569 |
| 1:13:30 | Average Match Time | 1:26:23 |
| 489.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.73 |
| 58% (21076/36337) | 1st Serve % | 71% (8581/12077) |
| 63% (13223/21076) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4776/8581) |
| 46% (6972/15261) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1477/3496) |
| 50% (2257/4519) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (861/1734) |
| 46% (16413/35330) | Return Points Win % | 49% (5932/12159) |
| 38.89% (14/22) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.62% (26/35) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 55.70% (249/198) | Challenger W/L | 47.46% (56/62) |
| 64.86% (96/52) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (64/48) |
| 57% (382/676) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (115/218) |
| 10% (1/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 52% (61/118) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (9/30) |
| 49% (85/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (25/55) |
| 86% (393/339) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (125/103) |
| 13% (393/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (125/21) |
| 16% (308/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (107/17) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:30 AM 30/10/25
PredictionW1
1.39
W2
2.83
04:00 AM 30/10/25
PredictionW1
1.083
W2
6.25
06:00 PM 30/10/25
PredictionW1
1.48
W2
2.64
04:00 AM 30/10/25
PredictionW1
3.62
W2
1.24
02:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.82
W2
1.86
05:00 PM 30/10/25
PredictionW1
1.075
W2
6.35
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Tan (W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq)
Tan vs BartashevichCould play in The Semifinals
Tan vs VandrommeCould play in The Semifinals
Tan vs SteinerCould play in The Semifinals
Tan vs PeetersCould play in The Semifinals
Tan vs PodrezCould play in The Quarterfinals
Tan vs MyatovicCould play in The Quarterfinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
29 Oct 2025
Karen Khachanov vs Joao Fonseca Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 29th October 2025 Best Bets
29 Oct 2025
Corentin Moutet vs Alexander Bublik Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 29th October 2025 Best Bets
29 Oct 2025
Sara Bejlek vs Laura Pigossi Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 29th October 2025 Best Bets
29 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Diallo Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
29 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Musetti Vs Sonego H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
29 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Dimitrov Vs Medvedev H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-6
H2H 6-4
18:00
H2H 5-2
18:30
H2H 3-4
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Yanagawa City
Japan
M25 Brisbane
Australia
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Harlingen
United States
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Qian Daohu
China
M25 Sintra
Portugal