Harriet Dart vs Tyra Caterina Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In analyzing the upcoming tennis match, the performance on the second serve over the past six months is revealing. Dart has secured 38.54% of points on their second serve, whereas Grant edges slightly ahead with 39.55%. It's well acknowledged that there is a strong connection between second serve statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.

When delving into return game performance, Dart has managed to win 50.76% of their opponents' second serve points recently, while Grant shows a marginally superior figure of 52.12%. For first serve returns, Dart has achieved a success rate of 34.73%, closely matched by Grant's 34.7%. These figures heavily influence predictions in head-to-head scenarios.

Analyzing performance under pressure, Dart has excelled by saving 50.74% of breakpoints, compared to Grant's 45.17%. Breakpoint conversion also tells a compelling story, with Dart converting 43.3% and Grant achieving a conversion rate of 40.96%. Such statistics are instrumental when forming live betting strategies during a match.

Looking at the overall performance from the last year, Dart has won 43.18% of their matches, translating to a win-loss record of 19/25. In contrast, Grant presents a more impressive win rate of 73.53%, with a win-loss tally of 25/9. These figures provide a broad overview of the head-to-head prediction landscape.

Ground surface performance is critical; Dart has historically excelled on hard courts with a 59% win percentage (W/L 207/145), while Grant demonstrates superior proficiency on indoor hard courts, achieving an 83% win rate (W/L 19/4). Both players register their weakest performance on clay courts, with win rates of 45% and 54% respectively.

An inspection of player levels reveals Dart competing predominantly in the Masters series, where they have won 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/8). In contrast, Grant has seen most success on the Challengers/ITF circuits, boasting a 76.92% win ratio (W/L 20/6). Such differences are vital when comparing stats for predicting favorites, emphasizing the importance of the event level.

Assessing the quality of oppositions, Dart's average opponent rank over the past year stands at 124.39, much higher than Grant's 345.26. This disparity highlights the different competitive pressures faced by each player. Furthermore, if the match extends to a deciding set, history favors Grant, who has triumphed in 64% of such instances compared to Dart's 50% success rate.

Considering the current event performance is crucial. Observing the players' form during ongoing tournaments provides valuable insight, given some players tend to excel at particular events. In summary, while both have strengths, the statistics suggest Grant holds a slight edge in the upcoming match, likely swaying the prediction in her favor.