Haruna Arakawa vs Jelena Cvijanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Cvijanovic outperforms Arakawa in recent second serve stats, winning 43.3% of points compared to Arakawa's 37.66%.
• Return Game: Arakawa excels in return games, winning 51.17% against opponents' second serves, compared to Cvijanovic's 47.19%.
• First Serve Returns: Arakawa also shows strength in returning first serves, with a rate of 38.16%, significantly higher than Cvijanovic's 25.54%.
• Under Pressure: Cvijanovic has a resilience advantage, saving 54% of breakpoints compared to Arakawa's 46.46%.
• Overall Performance: What does the win-loss record tell us? Arakawa has a stronger overall record, winning 57.35% of matches, double Cvijanovic's 34.48% over the last year.
• Best Surface: Arakawa shines on indoor hard surfaces with a 70% win rate, while Cvijanovic is best on grass, with a 57% win rate, where is the match being played?
• Event Level Experience: Arakawa has a slight edge in lower-tier events, with a win rate of 50.98% compared to Cvijanovic's 42.11% at the Challengers/ITF level.
• Opponent Quality: Arakawa has faced lower-ranked opponents on average, with a rank of 441.46, compared to Cvijanovic's 205.14.
• Deciding Set Composure: Arakawa maintains a strong performance in deciding sets, claiming victory in 69% of them, against Cvijanovic's 25% success rate.
• Breakpoint Conversion: A critical edge goes to Arakawa, who successfully converts 40.63% of breakpoints, while Cvijanovic manages only 21.67%.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

Evaluating the recent statistics of both players, we observe distinct patterns in their performances. While Cvijanovic has a better second serve point win percentage, Arakawa displays a superior ability to win points on the return, particularly against first serves.

Under pressure, Cvijanovic is marginally more adept at saving breakpoints. However, Arakawa compensates with better break point conversion rates, making them dangerous during crucial points in the match.

Taking into account overall performance, Arakawa's win-loss record in the past year significantly outpaces Cvijanovic's, suggesting a more consistent level of play. Moreover, Arakawa's strong performance in deciding sets and better adaptation to intricate pressure factors hint at a competitive edge.

Though Cvijanovic holds an edge on grass surfaces, Arakawa's proficiency on indoor hard courts is more pertinent unless the current event is on grass.

Given these assessments, Arakawa appears more likely to prevail in the upcoming tennis match, leveraging their strengths in return games and breakpoint scenarios.