Hazem Naow vs Sebastian Gima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Gima analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Sebastian Gima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 50.79% of points on his second serve, while Gima has won 50.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gima has won 56.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.36% and 34.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 61.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gima has saved 62.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 67.9% of matches played (W/L 55/ 26), with Gima winning 60.44% (W/L 55/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36). Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.37% of matches (W/L 38/ 16), where as Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.29% of matches (W/L 50/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naow winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Naow winning 4 and Gima winning 1. The last match between Naow and Gima was at the M15 Monastir, 17-01-2022, Final, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:44:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Gima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Naow winning 1 times and Gima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 3, and Gima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.07 while Gima has played against players with an average rank of 165.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gima has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 44.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gima has converted 42.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naow 2 - 0 Gima
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
465
Rank
436
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
66% (151-78)
Career Total W/L
59% (168-118)
76% (26-8)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hazem Naow | Sebastian Gima |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 32 | 27 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:44:30 | 2:44:30 |
1st Serve % | 70% (144/206) | 64% (129/201) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (86/144) | 57% (73/129) |
2nd Serve Win% | 55% (34/62) | 47% (34/72) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (12/27) | 38% (11/29) |
Return Points W% | 47% (94/201) | 42% (86/206) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(7) |
Hazem Naow
Player
Sebastian Gima
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
128)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
42%
(
51 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
128)
128
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
6-2 7-6(9) |
Hazem Naow
Player
Sebastian Gima
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hazem Naow | Sebastian Gima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 76% (26/8) | 58% (14/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 70% (54/23) | 56% (31/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (407/308) | 53% (260/228) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 64% (14/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.08 |
Aces Total | 75 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 123 | 46 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:21 | 1:40:26 |
Avg Opp Rank | 229.18 | 186.13 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1484/2347) | 60% (944/1573) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (1043/1484) | 65% (615/944) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (429/863) | 51% (318/629) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (119/273) | 44% (85/193) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (999/2323) | 44% (716/1638) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (14/4) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 62% (13/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (26/34) | 57% (13/23) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (22/22) | 87% (15/13) |
1st set W, L | 0% (22/0) | 13% (15/2) |
1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 11% (9/1) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Florent Bax
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dario Drebenstedt
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Sebastian Gima
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jan Hrazdil
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more