Hazem Naow vs Terence Atmane Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Atmane analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Terence Atmane Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 51.18% of points on his second serve, while Atmane has won 52.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Atmane has won 49.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.53% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 63.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Atmane has saved 70.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 70.59% of matches played (W/L 60/ 25), with Atmane winning 63.53% (W/L 54/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 19/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 54/ 35). Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16), where as Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.15% of matches (W/L 37/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Atmane winning 0. The last match between Naow and Atmane was at the M15 Monastir, 16-01-2022, Semifinals, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Atmane have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Atmane 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 1, and Atmane 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.04 while Atmane has played against players with an average rank of 237.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Atmane has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 46.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Atmane has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Atmane
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
333
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
129
Rank
129
High
22
Age
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
67% (151-76)
Career Total W/L
64% (178-102)
81% (26-6)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$243,885
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Hazem Naow | Terence Atmane |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:0 | 2:10:0 |
1st Serve % | 76% (58/76) | 54% (44/81) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (36/58) | 59% (26/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 41% (15/37) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 80% (4/5) |
Return Points W% | 49% (40/81) | 39% (30/76) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(3) |
Hazem Naow
Player
Terence Atmane
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Hazem Naow | Terence Atmane |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 81% (26/6) | 57% (13/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 74% (53/19) | 54% (31/26) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (394/281) | 51% (279/273) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (12/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (19/5) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.64 |
Aces Total | 73 | 175 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.35 |
DFs Total | 117 | 94 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:26 | 1:44:57 |
Avg Opp Rank | 227.69 | 179.17 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1409/2230) | 58% (1051/1803) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (995/1409) | 73% (767/1051) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (412/821) | 49% (370/752) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (117/257) | 45% (58/130) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (944/2175) | 35% (580/1638) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (14/4) | 80% (4/1) |
Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (26/32) | 62% (13/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 88% (7/8) | 64% (7/11) |
1st set W, W | 100% (22/22) | 83% (12/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (22/0) | 17% (12/2) |
1st set L, W | 40% (10/4) | 30% (10/3) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Lucas Poullain
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Zachary Svajda
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Sebastian Ofner
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Bor Artnak
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luca Nardi
Player
Terence Atmane
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Terence Atmane
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
101)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Terence Atmane
Player
Zachary Svajda
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more