Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hendrik Jebens vs Tanner K Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jebens vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Hendrik Jebens vs Tanner K Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jebens has won 39.74% of points on his second serve, while Smith has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jebens, in recent form, has won 33.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jebens has saved 57.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jebens has won 36.36% of matches played (W/L 4/ 7), with Smith winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jebens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 65/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 10/ 20). Smith has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 24/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Jebens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 4/ 6), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jebens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jebens winning 2 and Smith winning 0. The last match between Jebens and Smith was at the M25 Fort Worth, 22-10-2019, Q3, Hard with Hendrik Jebens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jebens and Smith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jebens winning 0 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jebens winning 0, and Smith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jebens has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.18 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jebens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jebens has converted 12.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jebens 1 - 0 Smith
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
50% (114-112)
Career Total W/L
54% (31-26)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hendrik Jebens | Tanner K Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 9 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:0 | 0:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (26/39) | 56% (24/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 50% (12/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (6/13) | 58% (11/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (20/43) | 26% (10/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Tanner K Smith
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hendrik Jebens | Tanner K Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 38% (25/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:3 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 450 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (142/220) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (103/142) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (31/78) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 13% (1/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 24% (45/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hendrik Jebens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Hendrik Jebens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Hendrik Jebens
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
7
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Hendrik Jebens
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Hendrik Jebens
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Sandro Kopp
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
16
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Hendrik Jebens
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Hendrik Jebens
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
2
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
8
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Hendrik Jebens
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
24 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Tanner K Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Tanner K Smith
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tanner K Smith
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tanner K Smith
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Simon Freund
Player
Tanner K Smith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Tanner K Smith
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jebens Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
