Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hernan Casanova vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Casanova vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Hernan Casanova vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Casanova has won 46.95% of points on his second serve, while Pichler has won 50.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Casanova, in recent form, has won 55.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 53.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.91% and 31.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Casanova has saved 56.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 57.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Casanova has won 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/ 31), with Pichler winning 46.15% (W/L 30/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Casanova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 449/ 261), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Casanova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Casanova winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Casanova winning 2 and Pichler winning 0. The last match between Casanova and Pichler was at the M25 Kiseljak, 27-05-2021, Second, Clay with Hernan Casanova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Casanova and Pichler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Casanova winning 0 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Casanova winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Casanova has played against opponents with an average rank of 344.74 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 202.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Casanova has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Casanova has converted 51.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 45.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Casanova 1 - 0 Pichler
336
Rank
221
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
595
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
63% (455-269)
Career Total W/L
56% (342-266)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$17,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hernan Casanova | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 84% (54/64) | 46% (24/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (34/54) | 63% (15/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (5/10) | 36% (10/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (27/52) | 39% (25/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Hernan Casanova
Player
David Pichler
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hernan Casanova | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (38/30) | 51% (24/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (331/285) | 51% (218/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (18/12) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:27 | 1:45:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 310.57 | 273.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (1470/1943) | 63% (857/1362) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (919/1470) | 68% (583/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (222/473) | 50% (252/505) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (113/218) | 45% (57/128) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (880/1999) | 40% (554/1392) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 10% (10/1) |
Hernan Casanova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Hernan Casanova
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Valerio Aboian
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ergi Kirkin
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Igor Gimenez
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Hernan Casanova
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Michiel De Krom
82%
(
84 of
102)
1st Serve %
80%
(
95 of
119)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ignasi Forcano
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Hernan Casanova
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Tristan Mccormick
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Casanova Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hernan Casanova
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
