Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Holger Rune vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rune vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Holger Rune vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rune has won 54.42% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rune, in recent form, has won 49.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 50.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.96% and 28.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rune has saved 67.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rune has won 62.32% of matches played (W/L 43/ 26), with Zandschulp winning 45.1% (W/L 23/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/ 8), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rune winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Rune winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Rune and Zandschulp was at the BMW Open - Munich, 23-04-2023, Final, Clay with Holger Rune getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rune and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rune winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rune winning 1, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rune has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.03 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 152.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rune has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rune has converted 35.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rune 2 - 0 Zandschulp
12
Rank
4
High
20
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
66% (221-114)
Career Total W/L
63% (326-193)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$5,630,010
Career Prize Money
$2,830,210
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rune VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Holger Rune | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:12 | 1:56:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (76/118) | 68% (98/145) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (46/76) | 60% (59/98) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (19/42) | 49% (23/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 53% (8/15) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (63/145) | 45% (53/118) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rune VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Holger Rune
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 3-4 ret. |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Holger Rune | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 33% (6/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (37/24) | 33% (13/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (317/289) | 45% (177/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.46 |
| Aces Total | 177 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:59 | 1:43:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 164.04 | 166.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1153/1912) | 64% (800/1251) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (861/1153) | 68% (544/800) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (418/759) | 47% (213/451) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (52/153) | 35% (33/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (692/1922) | 36% (431/1211) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 73% (11/4) | 36% (4/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (15/22) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (12/14) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 8% (12/1) |
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
70%
(
94 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Holger Rune
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Taylor Fritz
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Holger Rune
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Rune Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Holger Rune
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
