Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Holger Rune vs Thomas Fabbiano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rune vs Fabbiano analysis and find out who is favored!
Holger Rune vs Thomas Fabbiano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rune has won 54.22% of points on his second serve, while Fabbiano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rune, in recent form, has won 49.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fabbiano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rune has saved 67.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fabbiano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rune has won 61.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 27), with Fabbiano winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35). Fabbiano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 219/ 136), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 45/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Fabbiano has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rune winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Rune winning 4 and Fabbiano winning 2. The last match between Rune and Fabbiano was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 19-09-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Holger Rune getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rune and Fabbiano have played a deciding set 2 times, with Rune winning 2 times and Fabbiano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rune winning 0, and Fabbiano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rune has played against opponents with an average rank of 129.77 while Fabbiano has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rune has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fabbiano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rune has converted 34.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fabbiano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rune 2 - 0 Fabbiano
12
Rank
4
High
20
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
673
Rank
70
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
66% (222-115)
Career Total W/L
55% (521-428)
65% (17-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,660,230
Career Prize Money
$1,279,588
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Holger Rune | Thomas Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 31 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:29 | 2:5:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (98/150) | 63% (130/207) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (72/98) | 62% (80/130) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (30/52) | 45% (35/77) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 28% (8/29) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (92/207) | 32% (48/150) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Holger Rune
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Holger Rune | Thomas Fabbiano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (17/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (39/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (332/311) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 180 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 160.58 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1231/2029) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (915/1231) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (437/798) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (53/160) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (724/2030) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 87% (13/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
70%
(
94 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Holger Rune
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Taylor Fritz
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fabbiano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
47%
(
46 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Michael Agwi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Alastair Gray
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
2
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
48 of
59)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
47 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
8
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rune Vs Fabbiano Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
