Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Igor Sijsling vs Ruben Bemelmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sijsling vs Bemelmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Igor Sijsling vs Ruben Bemelmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sijsling has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bemelmans has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sijsling, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bemelmans has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sijsling has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bemelmans has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sijsling has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Bemelmans winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sijsling has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 165/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 31/ 29). Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84).
- Player level: In the last year, Sijsling has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Bemelmans has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Sijsling winning 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Sijsling winning 5 and Bemelmans winning 5. The last match between Sijsling and Bemelmans was at the Aachen Challenger, 13-11-2010, Semifinals, Carpet with Igor Sijsling getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:19:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sijsling and Bemelmans have played a deciding set 3 times, with Sijsling winning 3 times and Bemelmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Sijsling winning 1, and Bemelmans 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sijsling has played against opponents with an average rank of 513 while Bemelmans has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sijsling has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bemelmans has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sijsling has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bemelmans has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sijsling 3 - 1 Bemelmans
854
Rank
52
High
36
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor1
1
Grass0
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (524-385)
Career Total W/L
57% (552-419)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$716,195
Career Prize Money
$1,013,488
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Igor Sijsling | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 5 |
| Games Won | 53 | 50 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:19:36 | 0:19:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) | 67% (51/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (36/51) | 63% (32/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 56% (14/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (30/76) | 33% (26/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(8) | |||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Igor Sijsling
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-5 ret. | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Igor Sijsling | Ruben Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Igor Sijsling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Igor Sijsling
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Igor Sijsling
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Igor Sijsling
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Igor Sijsling
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Kaichi Uchida
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Daniel Siniakov
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Nicola Kuhn
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sijsling Vs Bemelmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
