Ilia Simakin vs Max Houkes Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 04:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Simakin vs M. Houkes

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Simakin 1 - 0 Houkes
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilia Simakin winning 2 and Max Houkes winning 0. The last match between Ilia Simakin and Max Houkes was at the Monastir Challenger, 27-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ilia Simakin getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Simakin | 1 |
| Houkes | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Monastir Challenger(10-27-25)
I. Simakin vs M. Houkes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.10% (156-80) | Career Total W/L | 64.97% (293-158) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Simakin vs M. Houkes Match Preview:
- Ilia Simakin has demonstrated superior second serve effectiveness recently, securing 47.24% of points compared to Max Houkes' 43.30%. Could this advantage in performance signal Simakin's dominance? It very well could.
- When examining return game stats, Simakin again leads by winning 43.73% of opponents' second serve points, slightly higher than Houkes at 41.79%. Yet, Houkes surpasses in return performance against first serves with 29.86% over Simakin’s 23.32%. This suggests that Houkes might capitalize on aggressive first serve returns.
- Under pressure, Simakin has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 59.91%, with Houkes lagging at 51.80%. Could this resilience under pressure give Simakin an edge in intense moments? It's possible.
- Assessment of the past year's records reveals that Simakin has a better win rate at 68.49% compared to Houkes' 60.27%. This indicates a consistent performance advantage for Simakin overall.
- Preference by surface shows Simakin's strength on Hard courts with a win rate of 68%. Conversely, Houkes thrives on Clay, also with a 68% win rate. The surface of the upcoming match will likely influence the outcome significantly.
- When considering the level of competition faced, Houkes has consistently played against higher-ranked opponents, lending him valuable experience against tougher competitors.
- If the match extends to a decisive set, Houkes has a notable advantage, clinching 63% of such sets compared to Simakin's 45%. This could suggest Houkes' prowess in high-pressure scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
Ilia Simakin showcases a remarkable second serve performance and under pressure plays, providing a clear advantage in critical match moments. These strengths suggest an edge when the competition becomes fierce.
Max Houkes, however, displays powerful first serve returns and excels in decisive sets, indicating resilience and capability to rebound during challenging phases.
Considering surface preferences, Simakin would thrive on Hard courts, whereas Houkes' prowess on Clay could shift the balance if conditions favor it.
Overall, Simakin's superior serving and resilience under pressure position him as the likely winner for this upcoming match.
Ilia Simakin vs Max Houkes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Simakin vs M. Houkes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:17:48 | Average Match Time | 1:17:48 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 69% (40/58) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
| 52% (30/58) | Return Points Win % | 32% (18/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Simakin Recent Matches Played
M. Houkes Recent Matches Played

I. Simakin vs M. Houkes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.10% (156/80) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.97% (293/158) |
| 64.60% (343/188) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.43% (643/387) |
| 55.61% (2791/2228) | Games Win/Loss | 55.71% (5363/4263) |
| 67.76% (145/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.91% (279/138) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1247 | Aces Total | 875 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 587 | Total Double Faults | 1597 |
| 1:30:7 | Average Match Time | 1:30:20 |
| 441.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.27 |
| 62% (9008/14565) | 1st Serve % | 61% (15388/25280) |
| 73% (6540/9008) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (10373/15388) |
| 52% (2872/5557) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4693/9892) |
| 42% (672/1598) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1406/2936) |
| 41% (6168/15108) | Return Points Win % | 44% (11169/25347) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 66.10% (39/20) | Challenger W/L | 49.52% (52/53) |
| 66.48% (117/59) | Futures W/L | 70.26% (241/102) |
| 66% (154/234) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (289/444) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (35/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (52/107) |
| 46% (28/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (73/134) |
| 92% (157/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (286/254) |
| 8% (157/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (286/31) |
| 14% (79/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (164/37) |