Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Miralles analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 48.77% of points on his second serve, while Miralles has won 45.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Miralles has won 48.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.14% and 31.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miralles has saved 53.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 57.63% of matches played (W/L 34/ 25), with Miralles winning 37.25% (W/L 19/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Miralles has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 288/ 167), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 35/ 48).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18), where as Miralles has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 21.05% of matches (W/L 4/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marchenko winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 0 and Miralles winning 2. The last match between Marchenko and Miralles was at the Heilbronn Challenger, 10-05-2021, First, Clay with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Miralles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marchenko winning 0 times and Miralles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 0, and Miralles 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.08 while Miralles has played against players with an average rank of 177.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miralles has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 40.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miralles has converted 42.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 0 - 1 Miralles
240
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
147
Rank
37
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (598-444)
Career Total W/L
57% (398-297)
29% (4-10)
YTD W/L
36% (8-14)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$1,171,255
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:7 | 1:41:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (34/74) | 60% (41/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 73% (30/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (19/40) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (23/68) | 47% (35/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Illya Marchenko
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (4/10) | 36% (8/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (11/22) | 38% (18/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (158/178) | 44% (193/244) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:5 | 1:37:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 277.5 | 228.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (643/1143) | 69% (1043/1509) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (440/643) | 58% (607/1043) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (240/500) | 47% (218/466) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (34/86) | 42% (53/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (383/1063) | 39% (518/1331) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 20% (2/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 67% (6/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (4/14) | 32% (6/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 8% (13/1) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Rincon
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
77 of
101)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
85%
(
28 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
46
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Billy Harris
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marco Cecchinato
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
46
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Lukas Neumayer
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Miralles Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
