Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Jesper DE Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Jesper DE Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 47.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 65.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 35/ 25), with Jong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Jong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.92 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 42.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 0 - 0 Jong
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Jesper DE Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 65 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 248.92 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (606/1081) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (411/606) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (234/475) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (33/84) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (366/1008) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (4/13) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 1st Match |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Brandon Holt
49%
(
55 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
August Holmgren
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
