Inigo Cervantes vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cervantes vs analysis and find out who is favored!
Inigo Cervantes vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cervantes has won 0% of points on his second serve, while has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cervantes, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cervantes has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cervantes has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 2/ 1), with winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cervantes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 348/ 254), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19). has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Cervantes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cervantes has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.67 while has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cervantes has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cervantes has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cervantes 0 - 0
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cervantes VS H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Inigo Cervantes | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Inigo Cervantes Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Inigo Cervantes
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Gastao Elias
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Inigo Cervantes
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Inigo Cervantes
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Inigo Cervantes
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
55 of
113)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Collignon
Player
Inigo Cervantes
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more