Ipek Oz vs Amandine Hesse Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the past six months, Oz has won 42.1% of points on their second serve, while Hesse has managed 40.25%. Is this slight edge significant in determining the favorite? Yes, given its correlation with match outcomes.
• Return game analysis shows Hesse has an advantage in winning 51.21% of opponents' second serve points compared to Oz's 47.15%. However, Oz edges ahead on first serve returns with 34.94% over Hesse’s 31.42%.
• Under pressure, Oz is stronger, saving 51.69% of breakpoints compared to Hesse's 45.49%, a critical factor during tense match moments.
• Over the past year, Hesse has a win rate of 48.48%, slightly ahead of Oz's 46.88%, suggesting a marginally better recent form.
• Surface preferences favor Oz on Clay (58% win rate) and Hesse on Hard courts (58%), each having their weaker surfaces with Oz struggling more on Hard (43%) and Hesse on Grass (27%).
• Both players have almost identical records at the Challenger/ITF tournaments, with Hesse slightly ahead at 49.21% vs. Oz’s 49.15%.
• In direct encounters, Oz leads 1-0, demonstrating historical superiority over Hesse in this rivalry.
• Head-to-head matches have been closely contested, with Oz winning the only deciding set they played and Hesse clinching the tiebreak encounter.
• Oz has faced tougher opponents on average, with rankings of 275.09 compared to Hesse's 345.83.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Oz’s win rate stands slightly higher at 44% against Hesse’s 41% in past matches.
• Both players convert breakpoints at similar rates, Oz at 36.81% and Hesse at 36.59%, indicating comparable clutch performance.

Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):

Considering recent performance data, Oz holds a slight edge on second serve points and first serve returns, which are crucial metrics in match predictions. This suggests an overall robust state from Oz in controlling longer rallies.

While Hesse’s return game is slightly more effective on second serve points, under pressure, Oz has shown a stronger breakpoint save percentage, an indicator of resilience in critical match stages.

In head-to-head matchups, Oz has demonstrated superiority by securing victories, reflecting a potentially psychological edge over Hesse.

Given these statistical insights, and despite Hesse's marginally better annual win rate and return game efficiency, Oz's comprehensive performance across critical metrics positions them as the likely winner in the upcoming match.