Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Issei Okamura vs Caio Silva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Okamura vs Silva analysis and find out who is favored!
Issei Okamura vs Caio Silva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Okamura has won 49% of points on his second serve, while Silva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Okamura, in recent form, has won 53.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Silva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.64% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Okamura has saved 61.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Silva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Okamura has won 41.86% of matches played (W/L 18/ 25), with Silva winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Okamura has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Silva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 104/ 151), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 20/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Okamura has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.86% of matches (W/L 18/ 25), where as Silva has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Okamura winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Okamura winning 2 and Silva winning 0. The last match between Okamura and Silva was at the China F2 (Anning), 21-02-2017, First, Clay with Issei Okamura getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Okamura and Silva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Okamura winning 0 times and Silva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Okamura winning 0, and Silva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Okamura has played against opponents with an average rank of 42.21 while Silva has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Okamura has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Silva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Okamura has converted 39.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Silva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Okamura 1 - 0 Silva
870
Rank
574
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
610
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
48% (211-232)
Career Total W/L
40% (124-186)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Issei Okamura | Caio Silva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:56:0 | 0:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (24/44) | 74% (28/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (21/24) | 43% (12/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 20% (2/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (24/38) | 27% (12/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Issei Okamura
Player
Caio Silva
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
74%
(
28 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Issei Okamura | Caio Silva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (17/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (166/163) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 45.24 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (364/534) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (233/364) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (82/170) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (22/60) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (227/555) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Issei Okamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Issei Okamura
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
75 of
94)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Issei Okamura
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Caio Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Sabanov
Player
Caio Silva
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
Player
Caio Silva
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Miele
Player
Caio Silva
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryusei Makiguchi
Player
Caio Silva
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erik Crepaldi
Player
Caio Silva
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thales Turini
Player
Caio Silva
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
22 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
43
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caio Silva
Player
Manuel Pena Lopez
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Caio Silva
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caio Silva
Player
Alexander Merino
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enrique Bogo
Player
Caio Silva
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
80%
(
72 of
90)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Okamura Vs Silva Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
