search

JONATHAN Gray vs Congsup Congcar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gray vs Congcar analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

JONATHAN Gray vs Congsup Congcar Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gray has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Congcar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gray, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Congcar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Gray has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Congcar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Gray has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Congcar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gray has played against opponents with an average rank of while Congcar has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gray has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Congcar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Gray has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Congcar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Gray 0 - 0 Congcar

JONATHAN Gray

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

N/A

Rank

High

27

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

27

Age

R

Plays

Congsup Congcar

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Form

L W W W L L L L W L

Career Total W/L

YTD W/L

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

YTD Titles

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Gray VS Congcar H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

JONATHAN Gray Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Jaime Faria
Player
Jonathan Gray
59% ( 26 of 44)
1st Serve %
48% ( 23 of 48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 19 of 26)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
27% ( 12 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 27 of 48)
59
Total Points Won
33
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Jonathan Gray
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
67% ( 18 of 27)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
29% ( 18 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 25 of 62)
70
Total Points Won
55
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Jonathan Gray
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
51% ( 20 of 39)
1st Serve %
78% ( 29 of 37)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75% ( 15 of 20)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 12 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 19 of 37)
46
Total Points Won
30
L
6-3 4-1 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Hady Habib
Player
Jonathan Gray
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve %
60% ( 36 of 60)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
33% ( 16 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 29 of 60)
62
Total Points Won
47
L
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Jonathan Gray
Player
Mateo Berta
63% ( 37 of 59)
1st Serve %
70% ( 42 of 60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65% ( 24 of 37)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 24 of 42)
50% ( 11 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
41% ( 24 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 30 of 60)
65
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Gianluca Acquaroli
Player
Jonathan Gray
63% ( 41 of 65)
1st Serve %
72% ( 47 of 65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61% ( 25 of 41)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
43% ( 28 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 33 of 65)
70
Total Points Won
60
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Jonathan Gray
Player
Duckhee Lee
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve %
64% ( 27 of 42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
48% ( 11 of 23)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
23% ( 3 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 7 of 15)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
61% ( 22 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 20 of 42)
34
Total Points Won
44
L
4-6 0-1 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Jonathan Gray
Player
Nathan Seateun
79% ( 57 of 72)
1st Serve %
67% ( 56 of 84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65% ( 37 of 57)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 34 of 56)
33% ( 5 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
42% ( 30 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 39 of 84)
81
Total Points Won
75
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jonathan Gray
Player
Omar El-Moslemany
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve %
51% ( 21 of 41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68% ( 23 of 34)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 7 of 21)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
35% ( 17 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
58
Total Points Won
32
L
6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Jonathan Gray
71% ( 76 of 107)
1st Serve %
83% ( 85 of 102)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
54% ( 41 of 76)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 45 of 85)
42% ( 13 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
57% ( 8 of 14)
50% ( 53 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 50 of 102)
104
Total Points Won
105
L
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) H2H

Congsup Congcar Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Congsup Congcar
60% ( 35 of 58)
1st Serve %
64% ( 43 of 67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71% ( 25 of 35)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 22 of 43)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 18 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 32 of 67)
72
Total Points Won
53
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Congsup Congcar
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
77% ( 48 of 62)
1st Serve %
50% ( 29 of 58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
77% ( 37 of 48)
1st Serve Won
79% ( 23 of 29)
50% ( 7 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
29% ( 18 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 24 of 58)
68
Total Points Won
52
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Samuel Brosset
Player
Congsup Congcar
61% ( 38 of 62)
1st Serve %
71% ( 41 of 58)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 23 of 41)
71% ( 17 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 8 of 17)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
27% ( 17 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 27 of 58)
72
Total Points Won
48
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Maik Steiner
Player
Congsup Congcar
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve %
65% ( 31 of 48)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90% ( 28 of 31)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
80% ( 8 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 8 of 17)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
12% ( 5 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 22 of 48)
58
Total Points Won
31
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Yunseong Chung
Player
Congsup Congcar
61% ( 36 of 59)
1st Serve %
48% ( 25 of 52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
31% ( 18 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 26 of 52)
67
Total Points Won
44
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Congsup Congcar
68% ( 43 of 63)
1st Serve %
68% ( 44 of 65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53% ( 23 of 43)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
75% ( 15 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
40% ( 25 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 65)
72
Total Points Won
56
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Congsup Congcar
Player
Cade Birrell
67% ( 68 of 102)
1st Serve %
61% ( 46 of 76)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
53% ( 36 of 68)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 28 of 46)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 9 of 30)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
48% ( 49 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 39 of 76)
92
Total Points Won
86
W
2-6 7-5 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Congsup Congcar
Player
Dharmil Shah
61% ( 22 of 36)
1st Serve %
60% ( 18 of 30)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
79% ( 11 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
19% ( 7 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 20 of 30)
49
Total Points Won
17
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Congsup Congcar
Player
Ivan Panin
59% ( 20 of 34)
1st Serve %
53% ( 20 of 38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75% ( 15 of 20)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
79% ( 11 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 3 of 18)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 8 of 34)
Rtn Points Won
71% ( 27 of 38)
53
Total Points Won
19
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Pengyu Lu
Player
Congsup Congcar
56% ( 37 of 66)
1st Serve %
50% ( 25 of 50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62% ( 23 of 37)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
41% ( 27 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
65
Total Points Won
51
L
6-3 6-2 H2H

Gray Vs Congcar Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions