Jack Findel-Hawkins vs Connor Thomson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Findel-Hawkins vs Thomson analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Findel-Hawkins vs Connor Thomson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Thomson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Findel-Hawkins, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thomson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thomson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Thomson winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Thomson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Findel-Hawkins winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Findel-Hawkins winning 2 and Thomson winning 0. The last match between Findel-Hawkins and Thomson was at the M25 Bolton, 01-04-2019, Q3, I.hard with Jack Findel-Hawkins getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Findel-Hawkins and Thomson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Findel-Hawkins winning 0 times and Thomson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Findel-Hawkins winning 0, and Thomson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Findel-Hawkins has played against opponents with an average rank of while Thomson has played against players with an average rank of 382.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thomson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thomson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Findel-Hawkins 1 - 0 Thomson
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (70-49)
Career Total W/L
29% (5-12)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Findel-Hawkins VS Thomson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Jack Findel-Hawkins | Connor Thomson |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) | 65% (30/46) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (31/43) | 70% (21/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (12/18) | 50% (8/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 37% (17/46) | 30% (18/61) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Findel-Hawkins VS Thomson H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Connor Thomson
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jack Findel-Hawkins | Connor Thomson |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Connor Thomson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Connor Thomson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Thomson
Player
Neil Oberleitner
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Connor Thomson
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
5
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Connor Thomson
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Billy Harris
Player
Connor Thomson
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Thomson
Player
Giles Hussey
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Connor Thomson
Player
Emile Hudd
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hendrik Jebens
Player
Connor Thomson
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Rosenzweig
Player
Connor Thomson
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Connor Thomson
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
53%
(
46 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 3-6 10-7 | H2H |
view more