Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Findel-Hawkins vs Daniel Labrador Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Findel-Hawkins vs Labrador analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Findel-Hawkins vs Daniel Labrador Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Labrador has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Findel-Hawkins, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Labrador has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Labrador has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Labrador winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Labrador has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Findel-Hawkins winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Findel-Hawkins winning 2 and Labrador winning 0. The last match between Findel-Hawkins and Labrador was at the M15 Tallahassee, 04-12-2019, First, I.hard with Jack Findel-Hawkins getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Findel-Hawkins and Labrador have played a deciding set 0 times, with Findel-Hawkins winning 0 times and Labrador 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Findel-Hawkins winning 0, and Labrador 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Findel-Hawkins has played against opponents with an average rank of while Labrador has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Findel-Hawkins has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Labrador has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Labrador has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Findel-Hawkins 1 - 0 Labrador
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
59% (70-49)
Career Total W/L
50% (9-9)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Findel-Hawkins VS Labrador H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jack Findel-Hawkins | Daniel Labrador |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (25/44) | 49% (22/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (17/25) | 55% (12/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 79% (15/19) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (27/45) | 27% (12/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Findel-Hawkins VS Labrador H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Findel-Hawkins | Daniel Labrador |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Labrador Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Daniel Labrador
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Labrador
Player
Mehdi Laalej
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Daniel Labrador
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
view more
Findel-Hawkins Vs Labrador Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
