Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Sock vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sock vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Sock vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sock has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sock, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sock has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 71.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sock has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakashima winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sock has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 79/ 48), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 149/ 133). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sock winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sock winning 2 and Nakashima winning 1. The last match between Sock and Nakashima was at the Indian Wells Challenger, 07-03-2020, Semifinals, Hard with Jack Sock getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sock and Nakashima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sock winning 1 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sock winning 0, and Nakashima 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sock has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 233.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sock has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sock has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sock 1 - 0 Nakashima
808
Rank
8
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (322-248)
Career Total W/L
61% (184-116)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
72% (26-10)
$4,932,130
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jack Sock | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (65/110) | 58% (47/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (51/65) | 72% (34/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (21/45) | 68% (23/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (24/81) | 35% (38/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jack Sock
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
12
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Sock | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 72% (26/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (54/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (439/362) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 278 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 294.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1625/2494) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (1222/1625) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (498/869) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (73/217) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (976/2634) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (25/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (25/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 12% (25/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Jack Sock Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jack Sock
62%
(
74 of
119)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Sock
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jack Sock
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Gregoire Barrere
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matija Pecotic
Player
Jack Sock
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
10
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Ilya Ivashka
56%
(
75 of
133)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
9
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
3
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
38%
(
22 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
41%
(
55 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Jack Sock
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Jack Sock
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Jack Sock
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sock Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
