Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacob Brumm vs Yankel Zemel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brumm vs Zemel analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Brumm vs Yankel Zemel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brumm has won 45.49% of points on his second serve, while Zemel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brumm, in recent form, has won 52.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zemel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brumm has saved 48.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zemel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brumm has won 42.31% of matches played (W/L 22/ 30), with Zemel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brumm has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 18/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10). Zemel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 124/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Brumm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.24% of matches (W/L 19/ 23), where as Zemel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brumm winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brumm winning 2 and Zemel winning 0. The last match between Brumm and Zemel was at the M15 Herzlia, 10-08-2022, First, Hard with Jacob Brumm getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brumm and Zemel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brumm winning 0 times and Zemel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brumm winning 1, and Zemel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brumm has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.67 while Zemel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brumm has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zemel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brumm has converted 46.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zemel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brumm 1 - 0 Zemel
703
Rank
691
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
51% (105-99)
Career Total W/L
53% (129-115)
17% (2-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jacob Brumm | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:0 | 2:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (49/74) | 54% (39/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (31/49) | 64% (25/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 39% (13/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (34/72) | 41% (30/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats 
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacob Brumm | Yankel Zemel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 19% (5/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 39% (94/145) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 260 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (406/730) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (246/406) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (146/324) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (28/59) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (289/755) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (2/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jacob Brumm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Oliver Crawford
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(0) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Rodolfo Jauregui Sainz De Rozas
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Jacob Brumm
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Orly Iradukunda
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Jacob Brumm
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bonnaud
Player
Jacob Brumm
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jacob Brumm
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Yankel Zemel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Hasson
Player
Yankel Zemel
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yankel Zemel
Player
Niv Zuckerman
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Yankel Zemel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brumm Vs Zemel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
