Jacob Fearnley vs Andrey Rublev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 04:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Fearnley vs A. Rublev

 GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 RUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 1 Rublev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacob Fearnley winning 0 and Andrey Rublev winning 2. The last match between Andrey Rublev and Jacob Fearnley was at the Rolex Paris Masters - Paris, 27-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Andrey Rublev getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Fearnley | 0 | 
| Rublev | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Rolex Paris Masters - Paris(10-27-25)
J. Fearnley vs A. Rublev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $919,075 | Career Prize Money | $18,673,350 | 
| 70.20% (106-45) | Career Total W/L | 64.08% (512-287) | 
| 0 | Indoor | 1 | 
| 6 | Titles | 0 | 
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 44.44% (16-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.63% (34-25) | 
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 | 
J. Fearnley vs A. Rublev Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Jacob Fearnley has won 44.27% of his second serve points, while Andrey Rublev has a slightly better rate at 46.11%.
- Fearnley has been more successful in returning second serves, capturing 47.51% of these points compared to Rublev's 44.30%.
- Both players have a solid first serve return, but Fearnley leads Rublev at 23.03% versus 20.93%.
- Under pressure, Rublev excels by saving 58.77% of breakpoints, whereas Fearnley saves 53.73%.
- Over the past year, Fearnley has a higher win rate of 57.81% compared to Rublev's 54.10%.
- Can surface preference affect the outcome? Fearnley's best is on indoor hard courts (80%), while Rublev's top performance is on hard courts (80%).
- Fearnley has mostly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a 63.16% success rate, while Rublev has played at a higher level in the main tour with a 60% win rate.
- Rublev has faced tougher opponents, holding an average rank of 71.52 compared to Fearnley’s opponents ranked at 150.59 on average.
- In deciding sets, Fearnley has an edge, having won 62% of them in the past year, against Rublev's 42% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of recent performances suggests an intriguing matchup between Jacob Fearnley and Andrey Rublev. While Rublev has a slight edge in second serve points, Fearnley exhibits superior return game statistics.
Rublev's ability to save breakpoints might prove crucial, especially under pressure. However, Fearnley has demonstrated a higher success rate in deciding sets, indicating a potential psychological advantage in tight scenarios.
Both players excel on hard courts, but Rublev's experience against stronger opponents could play a pivotal role. Despite this, Fearnley’s overall win rate and stronger return game cannot be overlooked.
Considering these factors, Jacob Fearnley appears more likely to win this upcoming match, leveraging his return skills and ability to manage crucial sets effectively.
Jacob Fearnley vs Andrey Rublev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Fearnley vs A. Rublev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 5 | Games Won | 12 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 | 
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 2 | 
| 1:18:6 | Average Match Time | 1:18:6 | 
| 68% (47/69) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) | 
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20/28) | 
| 23% (5/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (13/20) | 
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) | 
| 31% (15/48) | Return Points Win % | 52% (36/69) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
J. Fearnley Recent Matches Played
A. Rublev Recent Matches Played

J. Fearnley vs A. Rublev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.20% (106/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 64.49% (227/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 55.38% (1822/1468) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 65.96% (31/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 78.79% (52/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 59.09% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0 | 
| 712 | Aces Total | 0 | 
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 
| 664 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 1:29:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 220.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 | 
| 61% (5896/9642) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 73% (4304/5896) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (1868/3746) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 45% (453/1016) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 
| 41% (4046/9958) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.00% (6/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 58.82% (10/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 51.85% (14/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 79.59% (39/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 81.82% (36/8) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 72% (100/138) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (5/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 57% (23/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 
| 75% (30/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 95% (91/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 4% (91/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 33% (60/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 












