Jae Hwan Kim vs Masood Eisa-beygi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Eisa-beygi analysis and find out who is favored!
Jae Hwan Kim vs Masood Eisa-beygi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Eisa-beygi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eisa-beygi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eisa-beygi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 25% of matches played (W/L 1/ 3), with Eisa-beygi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 102/ 70). Eisa-beygi has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3), where as Eisa-beygi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.5 while Eisa-beygi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eisa-beygi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eisa-beygi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 0 - 0 Eisa-beygi
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kim VS Eisa-beygi H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jae Hwan Kim | Masood Eisa-beygi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Jae Hwan Kim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Hyun Woo Cho
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sanhui Shin
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Ajeet Rai
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Sanhui Shin
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Simone Agostini
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Masood Eisa-beygi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Omar Brigida
Player
Masood Eisa-Beygi
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more