Jakob Johansson-Holm vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johansson-Holm vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakob Johansson-Holm vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johansson-Holm has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johansson-Holm, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johansson-Holm has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johansson-Holm has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johansson-Holm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johansson-Holm has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johansson-Holm has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johansson-Holm has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Johansson-Holm 0 - 0 Jonge
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Johansson-Holm VS Jonge H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jakob Johansson-Holm | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Jakob Johansson-Holm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matyas Fuele
Player
Jakob Johansson-Holm
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tomas Farjat
Player
Jakob Johansson-Holm
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve %
59%
(
13 of
22)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
7 of
7)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
19
Total Points Won
13
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more