Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Mensik vs Daniel Cukierman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mensik vs Cukierman analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Mensik vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mensik has won 51.94% of points on his second serve, while Cukierman has won 49.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mensik, in recent form, has won 49.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 55.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.48% and 35.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mensik has saved 68.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 49.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mensik has won 64.18% of matches played (W/L 43/ 24), with Cukierman winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 35/ 25). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 43/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mensik winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mensik winning 2 and Cukierman winning 1. The last match between Mensik and Cukierman was at the M25 Heraklion, 18-11-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jakub Mensik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mensik and Cukierman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mensik winning 1 times and Cukierman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Mensik winning 1, and Cukierman 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mensik has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.93 while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 241.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mensik has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mensik has converted 40.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 44.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mensik 1 - 0 Cukierman
74
Rank
69
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
417
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
65% (93-50)
Career Total W/L
58% (245-178)
72% (18-7)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$593,365
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:56:0 | 2:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (59/100) | 68% (79/117) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (41/59) | 66% (52/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (23/41) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 100% (4/4) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (48/117) | 36% (36/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Jakub Mensik
Player
Daniel Cukierman
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
117)
7
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (18/7) | 62% (13/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (40/19) | 61% (30/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (314/278) | 55% (243/197) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (17/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 220 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 83 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:22 | 1:41:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.92 | 261.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1132/1889) | 62% (830/1333) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (849/1132) | 69% (571/830) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (403/757) | 49% (245/503) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (54/126) | 46% (76/165) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (630/1793) | 44% (635/1451) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 69% (9/13) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 22% (9/2) |
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
9
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Gael Monfils
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andrey Rublev
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andy Murray
62%
(
77 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
45 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mensik Vs Cukierman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jakub Mensik
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
