Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Paul vs Bart Stevens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Stevens analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Paul vs Bart Stevens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 51.53% of points on his second serve, while Stevens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 58.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stevens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 58.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stevens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 62.12% of matches played (W/L 41/ 25), with Stevens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Stevens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 38/ 20), where as Stevens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paul winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paul winning 4 and Stevens winning 0. The last match between Paul and Stevens was at the M15 Antalya, 02-06-2021, First, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Stevens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paul winning 0 times and Stevens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Stevens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.88 while Stevens has played against players with an average rank of 388.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stevens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 50.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stevens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paul 2 - 0 Stevens
522
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
862
Rank
736
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
54% (173-145)
Career Total W/L
54% (102-86)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Paul | Bart Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (65/109) | 56% (69/124) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (49/65) | 52% (36/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (23/44) | 51% (28/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (60/124) | 34% (37/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jakub Paul
Player
Bart Stevens
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Bart Stevens
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Paul | Bart Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (28/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (244/228) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 240.41 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1024/1533) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (633/1024) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (255/509) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (79/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (656/1526) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Bart Stevens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Bart Stevens
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Bart Stevens
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Bart Stevens
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Bart Stevens
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
111)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Bart Stevens
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
51%
(
37 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Bart Stevens
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bart Stevens
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
16
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Bart Stevens
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Stevens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
