James Kent Trotter vs Charles Broom Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 06:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Kent Trotter vs C. Broom

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Trotter 1 - 0 Broom
They have played 3 sets in total, with James Kent Trotter winning 2 and Charles Broom winning 1. The last match between James Kent Trotter and Charles Broom was at the Knoxville Challenger, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-4 1-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trotter | 1 |
| Broom | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Knoxville Challenger(11-04-25)
J. K. Trotter vs C. Broom H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $144,555 | Career Prize Money | $39,970 |
| 58.42% (118-84) | Career Total W/L | 61.90% (260-160) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. K. Trotter vs C. Broom Match Preview:
- In recent months, James Kent Trotter has been more effective with his second serve, winning 49.51% of those points compared to Charles Broom's 42.43%.
- While James has excelled with his second serve, Charles performs slightly better on second serve returns, winning 44.83% of those points compared to James's 43.52%.
- For first serve returns, Charles shows strength with a 27.91% win rate, significantly higher than James's 21.93%.
- Under pressure, James Kent Trotter has an edge in saving breakpoints, achieving a 57.62% success rate compared to Charles Broom's 52.97%.
- Comparatively, over the last year, Charles Broom has a higher match win percentage (61.40%) versus James Kent Trotter's 55.17%.
- Do surface preferences impact their predicted performance? James prefers indoor hard courts while Charles excels on clay.
- James has more experience against higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 269.47 compared to Charles's 346.61.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, James Kent Trotter has a superior record, winning 68% of such scenarios, whereas Charles wins 47%.
- Consider the level of tournament each player frequently competes in; James plays tougher Challenger/ITF events, while Charles dominates at the Futures level.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
With the upcoming match, several statistics highlight James Kent Trotter's potential edge. His robustness in saving breakpoints and his effectiveness in winning deciding sets could provide him with a crucial advantage.
Though Charles Broom has a better recent-win percentage and excels on clay, his performance may be hindered on other surfaces, especially when facing players ranked higher than those he typically encounters in Futures events.
Given these factors, particularly James's stronger second serve statistics and ability to handle pressure situations, he appears more likely to claim victory in the upcoming confrontation.
James Kent Trotter vs Charles Broom Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. K. Trotter vs C. Broom H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 16 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:58:57 | Average Match Time | 1:58:57 |
| 67% (68/101) | 1st Serve % | 55% (38/69) |
| 78% (53/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 89% (34/38) |
| 42% (14/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 74% (23/31) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 17% (12/69) | Return Points Win % | 34% (34/101) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. K. Trotter Recent Matches Played
C. Broom Recent Matches Played

J. K. Trotter vs C. Broom Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.42% (118/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.90% (260/160) |
| 54.78% (258/213) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.45% (585/399) |
| 52.00% (2448/2260) | Games Win/Loss | 53.96% (5015/4279) |
| 58.12% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.99% (130/67) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (44/22) |
| 63.64% (42/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.45% (61/49) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.19% (25/22) |
| 0.72 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1654 | Aces Total | 1766 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 584 | Total Double Faults | 1039 |
| 1:41:28 | Average Match Time | 1:28:6 |
| 385.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.74 |
| 60% (8183/13712) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15176/24429) |
| 76% (6255/8183) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10626/15176) |
| 51% (2835/5529) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4664/9252) |
| 37% (408/1092) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1103/2676) |
| 36% (4946/13792) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10640/25959) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 60.84% (87/56) | Challenger W/L | 44.35% (51/64) |
| 60.53% (23/15) | Futures W/L | 69.93% (207/89) |
| 58% (116/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (258/417) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (52/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (71/137) |
| 65% (45/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (77/143) |
| 90% (102/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (248/216) |
| 10% (102/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (248/32) |
| 26% (100/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (172/44) |