Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Kent Trotter vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trotter vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
James Kent Trotter vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trotter has won 51.84% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trotter, in recent form, has won 44.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 49.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.85% and 30.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trotter has saved 68.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trotter has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 27/ 21), with Kirchheimer winning 50% (W/L 27/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trotter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Player level: In the last year, Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Trotter winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Trotter winning 4 and Kirchheimer winning 0. The last match between Trotter and Kirchheimer was at the Granby Challenger, 16-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with James Kent Trotter getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trotter and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trotter winning 0 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Trotter winning 1, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trotter has played against opponents with an average rank of 319.88 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 283.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trotter has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trotter has converted 46.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 41.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trotter 2 - 0 Kirchheimer
399
Rank
393
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
475
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
56% (57-44)
Career Total W/L
56% (272-210)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trotter VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 21 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 2:3:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (82/147) | 67% (80/119) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (65/82) | 55% (44/80) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (30/65) | 56% (22/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/15) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (53/119) | 35% (52/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Trotter VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
James Kent Trotter
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
15
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Kent Trotter | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (15/17) | 47% (14/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (170/162) | 48% (134/148) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.78 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:50 | 1:53:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 315.19 | 508.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (627/1043) | 62% (567/920) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (481/627) | 70% (395/567) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (220/416) | 50% (176/353) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (24/55) | 38% (26/68) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (301/948) | 35% (311/878) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 33% (6/2) |
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
James Kent Trotter
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Robert Strombachs
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
15
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Mark Lajal
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
James Kent Trotter
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
18 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Trotter Vs Kirchheimer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
