James Mackinlay vs Adrian Toderascu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mackinlay vs Toderascu analysis and find out who is favored!
James Mackinlay vs Adrian Toderascu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mackinlay has won 45% of points on his second serve, while Toderascu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mackinlay, in recent form, has won 44.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Toderascu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.5% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mackinlay has saved 52.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Toderascu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mackinlay has won 50% of matches played (W/L 8/ 8), with Toderascu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mackinlay has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Toderascu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mackinlay has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8), where as Toderascu has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mackinlay winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mackinlay winning 2 and Toderascu winning 1. The last match between Mackinlay and Toderascu was at the M15 Sozopol, 10-10-2021, Q1 round, Hard with James Mackinlay getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mackinlay and Toderascu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mackinlay winning 1 times and Toderascu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mackinlay winning 0, and Toderascu 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mackinlay has played against opponents with an average rank of 54.88 while Toderascu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mackinlay has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Toderascu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mackinlay has converted 36.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Toderascu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mackinlay 1 - 0 Toderascu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
35% (13-24)
Career Total W/L
13% (1-7)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | James Mackinlay | Adrian Toderascu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 22 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(2) 6-2 10-6 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | James Mackinlay | Adrian Toderascu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 38% (21/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (27/39) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (13/27) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (27/75) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
James Mackinlay Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Harry Wendelken
Player
James Mackinlay
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
James Mackinlay
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Mackinlay
Player
Siim Troost
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
David Stevenson
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
Ioannis Stamatopoulos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James Mackinlay
Player
Francesco Paschetto
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martim Simoes
Player
James Mackinlay
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Adrian Toderascu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(2) 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 5-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more