James McCabe vs Cing-Yang Meng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Nov at 11:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. McCabe vs C. Meng

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McCabe 1 - 0 Meng
They have played 3 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 2 and Cing-Yang Meng winning 1. The last match between James McCabe and Cing-Yang Meng was at the Taipei Challenger, 03-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McCabe | 1 |
| Meng | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Taipei Challenger(11-03-25)
J. McCabe vs C. Meng H2H Profile
J. McCabe vs C. Meng Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in second serve performance? James Mc Cabe has won 42.14% of points on his recent second serve, slightly below Cing-Yang Meng's 42.99%.
- Examining return games, James Mc Cabe has the edge in converting 44.12% of second serve returns, compared to Cing-Yang Meng's 42.31%.
- In first serve return points, Cing-Yang Meng leads with 25.75% against Mc Cabe's 23.13%.
- Under pressure, James Mc Cabe saves 54.40% of breakpoints, outperforming Meng's 50.00% save rate.
- Who has a better recent form overall? Meng holds a slight edge with a 50% match win rate over the last year, while Mc Cabe has 46.27%.
- On their favored surfaces, Mc Cabe excels on Hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Meng prefers Clay with a similar percentage.
- Regarding playing levels, Mc Cabe has extensive experience in Challengers/ITF tournaments, while Meng has been active in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments.
- Against ranked opponents, Mc Cabe has faced players with an average ranking of 248.3, whereas Meng's opposition was stronger, averaging 171.63.
- In deciding sets, Meng shows greater resilience with a 67% win rate, narrowly surpassing Mc Cabe's 62%.
- It's crucial to review current event performances to grasp which player might bring a better form into this match.
Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match offers an intriguing battle, given the stats highlight each player's unique strengths. James Mc Cabe showcases notable resilience under pressure, excelling in breakpoint saves.
Conversely, Cing-Yang Meng demonstrates superior performance in first serve returns and against tougher opponents. Meng also holds a slight advantage in recent match win rates.
Factoring in second serve performance, first serve returns, and deciding set success, Cing-Yang Meng appears to have a marginal edge.
Assuming no unforeseen circumstances or fluctuations in form, Cing-Yang Meng is the favored player to secure victory in this matchup.
James McCabe vs Cing-Yang Meng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. McCabe vs C. Meng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:43:30 | Average Match Time | 2:43:30 |
| 60% (62/103) | 1st Serve % | 57% (63/110) |
| 82% (51/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (50/63) |
| 61% (25/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (22/47) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 35% (38/110) | Return Points Win % | 26% (27/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played
C. Meng Recent Matches Played

J. McCabe vs C. Meng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (168/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.78% (112/113) |
| 54.89% (376/309) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.30% (248/255) |
| 51.71% (3405/3180) | Games Win/Loss | 49.64% (2341/2375) |
| 60.09% (137/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.63% (71/75) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.71% (39/31) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2035 | Aces Total | 265 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 657 | Total Double Faults | 315 |
| 1:43:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 373.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.32 |
| 60% (11980/19946) | 1st Serve % | 68% (6393/9363) |
| 72% (8683/11980) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3991/6393) |
| 49% (3918/7966) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1440/2969) |
| 41% (711/1750) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (320/761) |
| 37% (7410/19790) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3245/8882) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.87% (83/74) | Challenger W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 70.87% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 50.93% (110/106) |
| 57% (161/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (110/216) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (66/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (25/51) |
| 58% (54/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (35/59) |
| 87% (156/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (111/95) |
| 13% (156/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (111/15) |
| 23% (138/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (114/16) |