James McCabe vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Oct at 08:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. McCabe vs J. Jung

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McCabe 1 - 0 Jung
They have played 3 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 2 and Jason Jung winning 1. The last match between James McCabe and Jason Jung was at the Suzhou Challenger, 20-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McCabe | 1 |
| Jung | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Suzhou Challenger(10-20-25)
J. McCabe vs J. Jung H2H Profile
J. McCabe vs J. Jung Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in second serve performance in recent months? James Mc Cabe won 42.43% of his second serve points, outperforming Jason Jung, who won 39.34%.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Mc Cabe again has the upper hand, winning 43.09% compared to Jung's 40.34%.
- Does Jason Jung have an advantage in returning first serves? Yes, Jung outperforms Mc Cabe with a 30.17% win rate versus 23.43%.
- In pressure moments, Mc Cabe saves 57.95% of breakpoints, showing composure compared to Jung's 51.35%.
- Looking at their performance over the past year, Mc Cabe has a significant edge, winning 45.45% of his matches, while Jung only 20.00%.
- Both players perform best on hard courts, with a career win rate of 60%. However, Mc Cabe struggles more on indoor hard courts with 33%, and Jung on grass with 43%.
- In terms of competitive level, Mc Cabe has participated mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 48.98% of these matches, which is higher than Jung’s 20.00%.
- Has opponent quality been a factor? Indeed, Mc Cabe has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 232.71 compared to Jung's 402.4.
- Do deciding sets reveal a clear favorite? Mc Cabe shines with a 58% win rate, whereas Jung hasn't secured any deciding sets.
- Current event performance can sway predictions, but historical metrics clearly favor Mc Cabe.
Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, James Mc Cabe exhibits stronger performance statistics, particularly in second serve success and return games. His ability to save breakpoints under pressure adds to his competitive edge.
Although Jason Jung shows strength in first serve returns, Mc Cabe’s overall match win percentage in the past year is notably superior, reflecting his effectiveness in handling the matches.
Considering their performance on favored surfaces, both excel on hard courts, yet Mc Cabe’s ability to maintain a steady performance against higher-ranked opponents is a significant advantage.
Furthermore, the stark difference in deciding set outcomes provides Mc Cabe with a psychological and statistical advantage, positioning him as a likely contender to claim victory.
With these key factors in mind, James Mc Cabe is projected to win against Jason Jung in this upcoming match.
James McCabe vs Jason Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. McCabe vs J. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:8:53 | Average Match Time | 2:8:53 |
| 58% (55/95) | 1st Serve % | 66% (67/101) |
| 76% (42/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (37/67) |
| 38% (15/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 46% (46/101) | Return Points Win % | 40% (38/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played
J. Jung Recent Matches Played

J. McCabe vs J. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (168/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.50% (414/332) |
| 54.89% (376/309) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.77% (948/783) |
| 51.71% (3405/3180) | Games Win/Loss | 52.01% (8585/7920) |
| 60.09% (137/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.00% (308/223) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.21% (31/32) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.89% (55/51) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2035 | Aces Total | 1939 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 657 | Total Double Faults | 1614 |
| 1:43:52 | Average Match Time | 1:12:44 |
| 373.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 566.59 |
| 60% (11980/19946) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25448/40150) |
| 72% (8683/11980) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (17436/25448) |
| 49% (3918/7966) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7519/14702) |
| 41% (711/1750) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1587/3932) |
| 37% (7410/19790) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15952/40798) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 46.25% (37/43) |
| 52.87% (83/74) | Challenger W/L | 54.18% (240/203) |
| 70.87% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 69.59% (119/52) |
| 57% (161/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (409/718) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 9% (2/22) |
| 52% (66/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (122/241) |
| 58% (54/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (113/217) |
| 87% (156/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (415/352) |
| 13% (156/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (415/63) |
| 23% (138/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (330/61) |