Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James McCabe vs Thai Kwiatkowski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our McCabe vs Kwiatkowski analysis and find out who is favored!
James McCabe vs Thai Kwiatkowski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), McCabe has won 51.27% of points on his second serve, while Kwiatkowski has won 48.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show McCabe, in recent form, has won 47.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kwiatkowski has won 51.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.78% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: McCabe has saved 63.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kwiatkowski has saved 62.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year McCabe has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Kwiatkowski winning 63.51% (W/L 47/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 84/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Kwiatkowski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 148/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Kwiatkowski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 30/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with McCabe winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with McCabe winning 1 and Kwiatkowski winning 0. The last match between McCabe and Kwiatkowski was at the Malaga Challenger, 26-06-2022, Q1 round, Hard with James McCabe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:21:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: McCabe and Kwiatkowski have played a deciding set 0 times, with McCabe winning 0 times and Kwiatkowski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with McCabe winning 0, and Kwiatkowski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, McCabe has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.68 while Kwiatkowski has played against players with an average rank of 249.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, McCabe has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kwiatkowski has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, McCabe has converted 41.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kwiatkowski has converted 45.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: McCabe 1 - 0 Kwiatkowski
365
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
275
Rank
181
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
59% (102-71)
Career Total W/L
58% (229-166)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
69% (20-9)
$17,900
Career Prize Money
$91,805
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
McCabe VS Kwiatkowski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | James McCabe | Thai Kwiatkowski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 6 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:21:53 | 0:21:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (10/16) | 73% (11/15) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 100% (10/10) | 55% (6/11) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 100% (6/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (8/15) | 0% (0/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
McCabe VS Kwiatkowski H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 0-0 ret. |
Stats 
James McCabe
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
24
Total Points Won
7
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James McCabe | Thai Kwiatkowski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 69% (20/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (37/29) | 69% (46/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (342/296) | 56% (358/286) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 88% (15/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 214 | 155 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 95 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:38 | 1:46:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.93 | 243.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1195/2035) | 59% (1181/2005) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (867/1195) | 75% (885/1181) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (440/840) | 48% (398/824) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (79/191) | 49% (101/205) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (771/2032) | 42% (865/2069) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 56% (10/8) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 100% (10/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 68% (19/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 79% (24/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 21% (24/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 20% (5/1) |
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Egor Gerasimov
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
32 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Federico Bondioli
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
James McCabe
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Rio Noguchi
43%
(
23 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Yi Zhou
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
James McCabe
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
James McCabe
80%
(
69 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
5
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jake Delaney
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thai Kwiatkowski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Tristan Boyer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
47%
(
35 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
7
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Andres Andrade
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Bertran
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Matija Pecotic
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Mwendwa Mbithi
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
36%
(
4 of
11)
1st Serve %
69%
(
11 of
16)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
18
Total Points Won
9
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
McCabe Vs Kwiatkowski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For James McCabe
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
