Jamie Loeb vs Stacey Fung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs S. Fung

Jamie Loeb

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.68m

Height

522

C. Rank

568

132

Best Rank

222

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$226.3K

Career Money

$8.8K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Stacey Fung

CAN

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.68m

Height

522

C. Rank

568

132

Best Rank

222

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$226.3K

Career Money

$8.8K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Loeb 2 - 1 Fung

They have played 9 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 5 and Stacey Fung winning 4. The last match between Jamie Loeb and Stacey Fung was at the W60 Rome, 05-10-2023, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Loeb	2
Fung	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) W60 Rome(10-05-23)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Stacey Fung

(R1) W100 Landisville(08-09-23)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Stacey Fung

(QF) W25 Fredericton(03-10-23)

Stats

Stacey Fung

Jamie Loeb

J. Loeb vs S. Fung H2H Profile

J. Loeb	Stats	S. Fung
$226,266	Career Prize Money	$8,800
53.91% (324-277)	Career Total W/L	62.63% (176-105)
1	Hard	0
1	Indoor	1
11	Titles	9
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Loeb vs S. Fung Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jamie Loeb has won 38.59% of points on their second serve, while Stacey Fung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jamie Loeb, in recent form, has won 53.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stacey Fung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.20% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jamie Loeb has saved 53.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stacey Fung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jamie Loeb has won 58.70% of matches played (W/L 27/19), with Stacey Fung winning 47.62% (W/L 10/11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jamie Loeb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 190/143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/17). Stacey Fung has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 40/23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Jamie Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/18), where as Stacey Fung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 10/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Jamie Loeb winning 2 times and Stacey Fung being victorious 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 5 and Stacey Fung winning 4.
The last match between Jamie Loeb and Stacey Fung was at the W60 Rome, 05-10-2023, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:28:40.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Jamie Loeb and Stacey Fung have played a deciding set 3 times, with Jamie Loeb winning 2 times and Stacey Fung 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jamie Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 394.83 while Stacey Fung has played against players with an average rank of 435.95.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jamie Loeb has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stacey Fung has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jamie Loeb has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stacey Fung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jamie Loeb vs Stacey Fung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Loeb vs S. Fung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Loeb	Stats	S. Fung
2	H2H Matches Won	1
5	Sets Won	4
41	Games Won	41
15	Aces (Total)	9
19	Total Double Faults	10
2:28:40	Average Match Time	2:28:40
53% (133/251)	1st Serve %	57% (155/271)
71% (95/133)	1st Serve Win %	65% (101/155)
42% (50/118)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (54/116)
48% (14/29)	Break Pts Won %	46% (13/28)
43% (116/271)	Return Points Win %	42% (106/251)
67% (2/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	33% (1/3)
67% (2/3)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (1/3)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Loeb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W75 Sumter - 02-06-2025
R1 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	5-7 6-4 3-1 ret.	Stats
Q3 Emily De OliveiraE. De	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q1 Abigail RencheliA. Rencheli	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
W35 Santo Domingo - 26-05-2025
R3 Thaisa Grana PedrettiT. Grana	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
R2 Mariana Isabel Higuita BarrazaM. Isabel	W	6-0 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Fung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W50 Santo Domingo - 24-03-2025
R2 Sara DaavettilaS. Daavettila	L	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
W50 Santo Domingo - 17-03-2025
R3 Maria MateasM. Mateas	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Ema Burgic BuckoE. Burgic	W	6-2 7-6(5)	Stats
W50 Birmingham - 10-02-2025
R2 Anna Sinclair RogersA. Sinclair	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
R1 Julie BelgraverJ. Belgraver	W	3-6 7-6(5) 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Loeb vs S. Fung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Loeb	Stats	S. Fung
53.91% (324/277)	YTD Win/Loss	62.63% (176/105)
53.36% (739/646)	Sets Win/Loss	62.30% (390/236)
51.27% (6503/6180)	Games Win/Loss	55.44% (3127/2513)
57.06% (190/143)	Hard Win/Loss	63.26% (136/79)
51.72% (90/84)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
52.17% (36/33)	Indoor Hard W/L	62.50% (40/24)
32.00% (8/17)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.13
1472	Aces Total	353
0.28	Double Faults Per Game	0.13
1745	Total Double Faults	368
1:18:23	Average Match Time	1:34:54
516.18	Average Opponent Rank	511.34
54% (17485/32413)	1st Serve %	67% (10259/15301)
65% (11351/17485)	1st Serve Win %	62% (6319/10259)
46% (6867/14927)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (2407/5043)
47% (1765/3778)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (1059/2173)
44% (14442/33101)	Return Points Win %	48% (7531/15767)
45.71% (16/19)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
37.50% (3/5)	Masters W/L	33.33% (1/2)
42.59% (23/31)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/2)
53.80% (255/219)	Challenger W/L	58.58% (99/70)
90.00% (27/3)	Futures W/L	71.70% (76/30)
54% (320/593)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	63% (173/274)
50% (2/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
45% (54/119)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	64% (30/47)
50% (92/183)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (29/69)
83% (344/287)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (188/163)
16% (344/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (188/24)
14% (257/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (93/13)