Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jan Choinski vs Evan Furness Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Choinski vs Furness analysis and find out who is favored!
Jan Choinski vs Evan Furness Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Choinski has won 51.94% of points on his second serve, while Furness has won 45.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Choinski, in recent form, has won 48.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Furness has won 51.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.73% and 37.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Choinski has saved 61.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Furness has saved 53.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Choinski has won 45.59% of matches played (W/L 31/ 37), with Furness winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 196/ 117), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11). Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Choinski winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Choinski winning 0 and Furness winning 4. The last match between Choinski and Furness was at the M15 Heraklion, 13-11-2020, Second, Hard with Evan Furness getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Choinski and Furness have played a deciding set 0 times, with Choinski winning 0 times and Furness 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Choinski winning 0, and Furness 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Choinski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.15 while Furness has played against players with an average rank of 200.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Choinski has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Furness has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Choinski has converted 42.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Furness has converted 49.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Choinski 0 - 2 Furness
184
Rank
126
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
722
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
59% (355-243)
Career Total W/L
59% (287-199)
38% (8-13)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$185,015
Career Prize Money
$5,730
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jan Choinski | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 10 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:45:30 | 0:45:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (42/62) | 64% (39/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (26/42) | 64% (25/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (6/20) | 64% (14/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (22/61) | 48% (30/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Jan Choinski
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jan Choinski | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (8/13) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (22/28) | 53% (24/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (248/245) | 50% (211/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (3/7) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 106 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:28 | 1:37:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 229.48 | 218.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1062/1606) | 60% (855/1415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (734/1062) | 63% (541/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (283/544) | 46% (257/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (52/119) | 49% (75/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (537/1514) | 43% (589/1364) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (3/9) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 0% (9/0) |
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Jan Choinski
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
21
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
54 of
83)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
26%
(
25 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Henri Haupt
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jan Choinski
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Joao Fonseca
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Duarte Vale
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
11
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Francisco Rocha
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Jan Choinski
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Jan Choinski
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Nikola Milojevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Choinski Vs Furness Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
