Jaroslav Pospisil vs PHILIP Bachmaier Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pospisil vs Bachmaier analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaroslav Pospisil vs PHILIP Bachmaier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pospisil has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bachmaier has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pospisil, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bachmaier has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pospisil has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bachmaier has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pospisil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Bachmaier winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pospisil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 111/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 33/ 46). Bachmaier has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Pospisil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Bachmaier has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pospisil has played against opponents with an average rank of 586 while Bachmaier has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pospisil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bachmaier has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pospisil has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bachmaier has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pospisil 0 - 0 Bachmaier
24
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jaroslav Pospisil | PHILIP Bachmaier |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Jaroslav Pospisil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Noah Rubin
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
17
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
PHILIP Bachmaier Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Alexandr Binda
Player
Philip Bachmaier
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Bachmaier
Player
Alessandro Ragazzi
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matyas Fuele
Player
Philip Bachmaier
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
Player
Philip Bachmaier
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Luca Fantini
Player
Philip Bachmaier
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Philip Bachmaier
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Stefano Battaglino
Player
Philip Bachmaier
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
66 of
117)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more