Jason Jung vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jung vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Jason Jung vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jung has won 52.8% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 50.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jung, in recent form, has won 53.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.78% and 27.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jung has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 60.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jung has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 36/ 21), with Sandgren winning 52% (W/L 26/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 307/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 88/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 25/ 15), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jung winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jung winning 2 and Sandgren winning 2. The last match between Jung and Sandgren was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 14-07-2021, Second, Grass with Jason Jung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jung and Sandgren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jung winning 0 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jung winning 0, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jung has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.14 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 279.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jung has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jung has converted 41.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 31.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jung 1 - 1 Sandgren
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
256
Rank
114
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
280
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
11
Minor
Form
56% (412-327)
Career Total W/L
56% (416-322)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$350,585
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jason Jung | Tennys Sandgren |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 18 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 0:33:29 | 0:33:29 |
1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) | 57% (29/51) |
1st Serve Win% | 88% (29/33) | 66% (19/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (5/15) | 32% (7/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/6) |
Return Points W% | 49% (25/51) | 29% (14/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Jason Jung
Player
Tennys Sandgren
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jason Jung | Tennys Sandgren |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 62% (21/13) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (64/52) | 53% (196/171) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 50% (4/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 1.01 |
Aces Total | 22 | 181 |
DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 10 | 28 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:41 | 1:52:52 |
Avg Opp Rank | 330.67 | 317.07 |
1st Serve % | 65% (233/358) | 62% (686/1107) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (168/233) | 78% (537/686) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (69/125) | 53% (225/421) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (15/40) | 34% (32/95) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (148/383) | 34% (387/1130) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 55% (6/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 58% (7/12) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Jason Jung Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Matteo Gigante
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jason Jung
Player
Aziz Dougaz
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jason Jung
Player
Maximus Jones
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Manuel Guinard
Player
Jason Jung
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jason Jung
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jason Jung
Player
Yunseong Chung
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jason Jung
Player
Zdenek Kolar
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Trevor Svajda
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
3
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Tennys Sandgren
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
14
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
51 of
59)
74%
(
26 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
17 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
23 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(10) 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Henri Squire
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
19
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
14 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more