Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cosano vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cosano has won 54.75% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 49.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cosano, in recent form, has won 54.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 54.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.93% and 35.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cosano has saved 62.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 56.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cosano has won 64.56% of matches played (W/L 51/ 28), with Nijboer winning 64.13% (W/L 59/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 295/ 176), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cosano winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cosano winning 2 and Nijboer winning 1. The last match between Cosano and Nijboer was at the M25 Zaragoza, 07-10-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cosano and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cosano winning 1 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cosano winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cosano has played against opponents with an average rank of 320.94 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 160.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cosano has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cosano has converted 46.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cosano 1 - 0 Nijboer
263
Rank
247
High
25
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
62% (327-204)
Career Total W/L
57% (217-165)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$32,000
Career Prize Money
$5,735
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Javier Barranco Cosano | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:28:0 | 2:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (58/90) | 64% (56/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (39/58) | 59% (33/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (12/32) | 35% (11/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (43/87) | 43% (39/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ryan Nijboer
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Javier Barranco Cosano | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (48/29) | 58% (35/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (388/320) | 55% (308/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (15/7) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 109 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 101 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:33 | 1:47:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 345.38 | 218.73 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1370/2189) | 59% (1030/1739) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (867/1370) | 71% (729/1030) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (460/819) | 50% (358/709) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (121/267) | 45% (93/205) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (982/2250) | 42% (758/1802) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (20/30) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 46% (6/13) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Mathys Erhard
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cosano Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
