Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeremy Chardy vs Frank Dancevic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chardy vs Dancevic analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Chardy vs Frank Dancevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chardy has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Dancevic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chardy, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dancevic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chardy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancevic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chardy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 4), with Dancevic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146). Dancevic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 103/ 67), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 95/ 78).
- Player level: In the last year, Chardy has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Dancevic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chardy winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Chardy winning 2 and Dancevic winning 2. The last match between Chardy and Dancevic was at the China Open - Beijing, 28-09-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Jeremy Chardy getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chardy and Dancevic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chardy winning 0 times and Dancevic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chardy winning 0, and Dancevic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chardy has played against opponents with an average rank of 45.25 while Dancevic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chardy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancevic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chardy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancevic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chardy 1 - 1 Dancevic
770
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
65
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
54% (494-426)
Career Total W/L
57% (500-370)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,487,593
Career Prize Money
$779,866
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jeremy Chardy | Frank Dancevic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 21 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:18 | 1:16:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (75/138) | 48% (61/126) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (60/75) | 70% (43/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (25/63) | 54% (35/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (48/126) | 38% (53/138) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frank Dancevic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(0) |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Jeremy Chardy
41%
(
28 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
12
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
11
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeremy Chardy | Frank Dancevic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Frank Dancevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Frank Dancevic
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frank Dancevic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Frank Dancevic
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Frank Dancevic
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
11
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Alexander Sarkissian
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
14
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Lucas Miedler
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Frank Dancevic
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Frank Dancevic
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Brayden Schnur
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chardy Vs Dancevic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
